LOL! It's been translated and is all over the referendum topics online. I had it translated, also. You can't argue because you are not good at debate.
If you had it translated, why did you write this bullshit about "status-quo"? They could vote for Ukraine as well. There was such a question.

you don't respect that Ukrainians might want a voice. Yes, even if they are misled, they still have a voice in their own country - the parts left, anyway.
Firstly, de jure there is no such country as Ukraine. So even if I want to ask someone I can't. Well, Americans can do that because this criminal Ukrainian Government is kinda "twin soul" for them.
Secondly, the right of Nations to self-determination doesn't imply asking someone. A nation just postulates its will and that's all. Of course, you know it, too. Because there is Kosovo's precedent, for example.

They made sure no one met with anyone in Crimea to talk about it, didn't they?
I don't understand the question. What do you mean? Who did meet with? Russian soldiers with the citizens? Or the citizens with each other?
Russian soldiers live in Crimea as ordinary people, with their families etc. I don't understand what you meant.
Anyway, Russian soldiers had nothing to do with the result. They just protected important objects because there was likelihood that Ukraininan soldiers (well, some of them) might fulfil criminal commands from Kiev. I even don't speak about armed Nazi bandits who wanted to come to Crimea and "teach" its inhabitants how to live further. Oh, I'm sure it would be a democratic choice and you would approve it!

They are misled like Ukrainians, though, but they'll find out soon enough.
I don't understand your hint. What will we find out? Make it clear and afterwards we can check it.