Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Please check out my text

  1. #1
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    458
    Rep Power
    14

    Please check out my text

    I have to prepare a small text about any operating system. Here is what I gave birth to. Could someone read it and correct mistakes?

    Introductory.

    I want to tell about Linux operating system. It's my current operating system, and I haven't seen anything better, be sure! The plan of my report is:
    a) why I choose open source?
    b) shortcomings.
    c) conclusion

    Why I choose open source?

    The main thing of open source for me is that I don't have to pay money for software. Moreover, I always can read sources and modify the software I use. It doesn't matter that I maybe won't do it. I can do it, and it's wonderful. For me open source means:

    1.Quality. There is a large number of high-qualified developers which do high-quality things. There is no software company which can make such developers community in its offices.

    2.Independent. I'm free of marketing strategies of large corporations, no one makes me to buy another version of a “mega-cool program”, no one makes my choice for me.

    3.Confidence. I always know what my system do, I am able to tune even very insignificant patterns of my system's behavior. In fact, I am able to make my own system based on the system template which I have.

    4.Lack of unfair competition. I have some idea and want to tell you about it. Take, for example, Microsoft. There are various cases when it used unfair competition in order to make users use its products. But what does it mean? If corporation leaders think that unfair competitive struggle is necessary to promote their product, it means that they aren't sure that their product is better than rival's one. But if even the main leaders aren't sure in it, how can an ordinary user be sure? And notice the last fact: open source world doesn't know the term “unfair competition”. These guys just do their work, nothing more. And I like it very much.

    Shortcomings.

    For me the main shortcoming of free software in general and Linux in particular is that the most part of the world use proprietary software. Open source guys try to make their products compatible with proprietary ones, but corporations try not to tolerate this.

    The second and more important (for others, not for me ) shortcoming is that usually open source products demand more qualification of users than proprietary ones. I have tried to install and tune Linux on my PC for six times, and only seven attempt was successful. But now, when I understood the spirit of Linux, tuning of my system became an easy and pleasant deal.

    But it's well known fact, that a system can't be secure without qualified users. That means that if the most part of PC users knew more about white boxes they use every day, hackers attacks and viruses epidemics would be far more infrequent. From this point of view demand of qualified users seems not critical shortcoming, but barrier which helps us, Linux users, to protect ourselves from dummies which can destroy our happy world

    Conclusion

    My own negative experience of word-of-mouth Linux advertising showed me, that each person must come to Linux by himself, without any side advices, and it isn't possible to make people love Linux. But I think everyone must at least try it...
    My English isn't so good, зато с русским все в порядке ))
    I'll be very thankful, if you correct my mistakes.

  2. #2
    Властелин
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Moscow, Russia
    Posts
    1,437
    Rep Power
    16
    Wow, I started studying Linux just recently so it's topical for me. I'm glad I did.
    "Happy new year, happy new year
    May we all have a vision now and then
    Of a world where every neighbour is a friend"

  3. #3
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Mowcow, Russia
    Posts
    1,957
    Rep Power
    15
    Мой совет: отложи текст на пару дней и перечитай его свежим взглядом ещё раз . Я уверен, ты сам заметишь многие из своих ошибок.

    Их не так уж мало, хотя они не настолько серьёзны, чтобы сделать текст непонятным.

    Начнём сначала:
    Why I choose open source?
    Why do I choose

    "The main thing of open source" - в общем, не то чтобы совсем неправильно, просто звучит как-то неестественно. Может быть, "The most important feature of open source software" или как-то в этом роде.

    "To pay money" - "масло масляное", по крайней мере, в данном контексте. Напиши просто "to pay for software."

    "Quality, independent, confidence." Не ряд. Вопрос на засыпку: какое слово выбивается из ряда? (Тонкий намёк: "жёлтый, синева, зелёный".

    " I always know what my system do" - "does" (или, ещё лучше, "is doing").

    "very insignificant patterns" - что ты тут имеешь в виду? Слово "patterns" мне тут не совсем нравится.

    In fact, I am able to make my own system...

    Вместо "make" я бы использовал другое слово, например, "create",
    "build" или что-то в этом роде.

    ...based on the system template which I have. Может быть, "based on an existing system/configuration"?

    И т.д... ещё одна ошибка, о которой в этом форуме ещё говорилось: "квалифицированный" (в смысле, умелый, обладающий достаточными навыками для чего-то) - это "skilled", не "qualified."

    Мне сейчас некогда весь текст разбирать, но, я надеюсь, найдутся добровольцы из числа native speakers .

  4. #4
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    458
    Rep Power
    14

    Ну да, понятно. За поласа просто слабал, да и спать хочу. Завтра (точнее, уже сегодня) сдавать, так что отложить не могу. Фиг с ним, прорвемся как-нибудь
    My English isn't so good, зато с русским все в порядке ))
    I'll be very thankful, if you correct my mistakes.

  5. #5
    DDT
    DDT is offline
    Завсегдатай DDT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    I have given up the Gambling, the Wine and the Cows!.. I'm in St Petersburg Russia
    Posts
    3,368
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: Please check out my text

    Quote Originally Posted by pranki
    Conclusion

    My own negative experience of word-of-mouth Linux advertising showed me, that each person must come to Linux by himself, without any side advices, and it isn't possible to make people love Linux. But I think everyone must at least try it...
    I have just picked this at random for corrections.

    My own negative experience with Linux's word of mouth advertising has shown me that each person must make the decision to come to Linux by himself and that it isn't possible to make someone love Linux. I think that everyone must at least try it!
    Let me be a free man, free to travel, free to stop, free to work, free to trade where I choose, free to choose my own teachers, free to follow the religion of my fathers, free to talk, think and act for myself. - Chief Joseph, Nez Perce

  6. #6
    Увлечённый спикер
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Maine, USA
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    13
    I'll make the corrections below that are grammatical errors. I will try to bold any changes that I make.

    In addition, some of your setences are not necessarily incorrect but they are akward in that you can tell that English is not your native language. I hope this helps some.


    Introduction.

    I want to tell you about the Linux operating system. It's my current operating system [no comma necessary] and I haven't seen anything better, to be sure!

    The outlineof my report is:
    a) why did I choose open source?
    b) shortcomings.
    c) conclusion

    Why did I choose open source?

    The main thing of open source for me is that I don't have to pay money for software. Moreover, I always can read sources and modify the software I use. It doesn't matter that I maybe won't do it. I can do it [no comma necessary] and it's wonderful. For me open source means:

    1.Quality. There is a large number of highly-qualified developers who can do high-quality things. There is not a software company that can make such developers community in its offices. [I'm not sure what you mean by this sentence the second half of it doesn't make sense.]

    2.Independent. I'm free of marketing strategies of large corporations, no one makes me to buy another version of a “mega-cool program”, and no one makes my choice for me. [Note: Mega-Cool is phrase that is used primarily by teenagers and young people. It would not be appropriate in a business or professional setting.]

    3.Confidence. I always know what my system does. [You need a period here not a comma.] I am able to tune even very insignificant [minute would be a better would to use than insignificant - insignficant means not important] patterns of my system's behavior. In fact, I am able to make my own system based on the system template which I have ['which I have' can be deleted, it isn't necessary.]

    4.Lack of unfair competition. I have some ideas and want to tell you about them. Take [no comma necessary] for example, Microsoft. There are various cases when it used unfair competition in order to make users use [you shouldn't use users followed by use - perhaps say people use] its products. But what does that mean? If corporation leaders [executives is a better word than leaders - we usually call the heads of a company executives] think that unfair competition is necessary to promote their product, then they aren't sure that their product is better than their competition's . Even if the main leaders aren't sure [don't need the words 'in it'], how can an ordinary user be sure? [Don't start a sentence with the world 'and' ] Notice the last fact: the open source world doesn't know the term “unfair competition”. These guys just do their work and nothing more. [Again, don't start a sentence with the word 'and'] I like it very much.

    Shortcomings.

    For me the main shortcoming of free software in general and Linux in particular is that the most parts of the world use proprietary software. Open source guys try to make their products compatible with proprietary ones, but corporations try not to tolerate this. [This paragraph is really awkward and I'm not really sure what you are trying to say.]

    The second and more important (for others, not for me) shortcoming is that usually open source products demand more qualification of users than proprietary ones. I have tried to install and tune Linux on my PC [don't need the word 'for'] six times, and only the seven attempt was successful. But now that I understood the spirit of Linux, tuning my system is an easy and pleasant deal.

    But it's a well known fact, that a system can't be secure without qualified users. That means that for the most part if PC users knew more about the white boxes they use every day, hackers, [need a comma] attacks, [need a comma] and virus [not plural] epidemics would be far more infrequent. [By the way many of our computers are no longer white. Computers here come in many colors especially black. Thus white box is not a good analogy.] From this point of view, demand of qualified users seems not critical shortcoming, but barrier which helps us Linux users to protect ourselves from dummies which can destroy our happy world . [I'm not sure what you are trying to say in this last sentence. It is not worded correctly.]

    Conclusion

    My own negative experience from word-of-mouth Linux advertising showed me [don't need a comma] that each person must come to Linux by himself, without any side advices, and it isn't possible to make people love Linux. But I think everyone should at least try it...
    [/b]

  7. #7
    Властелин
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,115
    Rep Power
    15
    I'm adding further corrections to ancestry's corrected version

    Introduction.

    I want to tell you about the Linux operating system. It's my current operating system and I surely haven't seen anything better!

    The outline of my report is:
    a) why did I choose open source?
    b) shortcomings.
    c) conclusion

    Why did I choose open source?

    The main reason I chose open source is that I don't have to pay [no need to say "money" here] for software. Moreover, I always can read source code and modify the software I use. It doesn't matter that I might not. I can do it and it's wonderful. For me open source means:

    1.Quality. There are a large number of highly-qualified developers who can do high-quality work. There is not a software company that can make such developers community in its offices. [I'm not sure what you mean by this sentence the second half of it doesn't make sense.]

    2.Independence. I'm free from marketing strategies of large corporations; no one makes me [no 'to' needed] buy another version of a “mega-cool program”, and no one makes my choice for me. [Note: Mega-Cool is phrase that is used primarily by teenagers and young people. It would not be appropriate in a business or professional setting.]
    [Note 2: Being a teenager and young person I can honestly say we don't use it.]

    3.Confidence. I always know what my system is doing. I am able to tune even very minute patterns of my system's behavior. In fact, I am able to make my own system based on the system template.

    4.Lack of unfair competition. I have some ideas and want to tell you about them. Take for example, Microsoft. There are various cases of Microsoft using unfair competition in order to make consumers buy their [I think corporations are referred to in the plural] products. But what does that mean? If corporation executives think that unfair competition is necessary to promote their products, then they aren't sure that their product is better than their competition's. [No even needed] If the main executives aren't sure, how can an ordinary user be sure? Notice the last fact: the open source world doesn't know the term “unfair competition”. These guys just do their work and nothing more. [Again, don't start a sentence with the word 'and'] I like it very much.

    Shortcomings.

    For me the main shortcoming of free software in general and Linux in particular is that the most parts of the world use proprietary software. Open source developers try to make their products compatible with proprietary ones, but corporations do not tolerate this.

    The second and more important (for others, not for me) shortcoming is that usually open source products demand more qualification of users than proprietary ones. I have tried to install and tune Linux on my PC [don't need the word 'for'] six times, and only the seven attempt was successful. But now that I understand the spirit of Linux, tuning my system is an easy and pleasant deal.

    But it's a well known fact that a system can't be secure without qualified users. That means that for the most part if PC users knew more about the white boxes they use every day, hackers, attacks, and virus epidemics would be far more infrequent. From this point of view, demand of qualified users is not a critical shortcoming, but a barrier which helps Linux users protect themselves from dummies who can destroy our happy world .

    Conclusion

    My own negative experience from word-of-mouth Linux advertising showed me that each person must come to Linux by himself, without any outside influences, and it isn't possible to make people love Linux. But I think everyone should at least try it...
    Corrupting young minds since May 6, 2004.

  8. #8
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Serving Polonium-flavoured Sake at a London Japanese Restaurant
    Posts
    2,662
    Rep Power
    15
    Just one more thing that I noticed: your contractions (I'm, haven't, etc.) may not be appropriate. It depends on the formality of your article -- if you are submitting this formally, you are not supposed to use contractions but the full form of the words (I am, I have not, etc.). If it's just a casual article, practice for your writing, etc., then by all means use them.
    Заранее благодарю всех за исправление ошибок в моём русском.

  9. #9
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    las vegas
    Posts
    1,687
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackMage
    I'm adding further corrections to ancestry's corrected version

    Introduction.

    I want to tell you about the Linux operating system. It's my current operating system and I surely haven't seen anything better!

    The outline of my report is:
    a) why did I choose open source?
    b) shortcomings.
    c) conclusion

    Why did I choose open source?

    The main reason I chose open source is that I don't have to pay [no need to say "money" here] for software. Moreover, I always can read source code and modify the software I use. It doesn't matter that I might not. I can do it and it's wonderful. For me open source means:
    ...
    There are no grammer erros and it sounds ok, but I think stylistically it would be a little bit better to say the following:

    Introduction.

    I currently use Linux as my operating system and I have to say that I surely have not seen anything better!

    The purpose of this report is to explain:
    a) why I choose Open Source?
    b) its shortcomings
    c) my conclusions

    Why did I choose Open Source?

    The primary reason I chose Open Source is because it is free. Moreover, I always can read and modify the source code. Whether or not I modify the software, I find it wonderful that the capability is available.

    For me open source means:
    ...

    I personally do not like saying "is because" but I could not find a better way to phrase the sentence. Any suggestions would be welcome.

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackMage
    1.Quality. There are a large number of highly-qualified developers who can do high-quality work. There is not a software company that can make such developers community in its offices. [I'm not sure what you mean by this sentence the second half of it doesn't make sense.]
    LOL. "highly-qualified developers who can do high-quality work", Duh

    1.Quality. Open Source has the best community of highly-qualified software developers that is unmatched by any other software company.

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackMage
    2.Independence. I'm free from marketing strategies of large corporations; no one makes me [no 'to' needed] buy another version of a “mega-cool program”, and no one makes my choice for me. [Note: Mega-Cool is phrase that is used primarily by teenagers and young people. It would not be appropriate in a business or professional setting.]
    [Note 2: Being a teenager and young person I can honestly say we don't use it.]
    2.Independence. I'm free from the marketing strategies of large corporations; nobody forces me to buy another version of a “mega-cool program”, and nobody makes my choice for me.

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackMage
    3.Confidence. I always know what my system is doing. I am able to tune even very minute patterns of my system's behavior. In fact, I am able to make my own system based on the system template.
    3.Confidence. I always know what my system is doing. I am able to tune even the most insignificant patterns of the system's behavior. In fact, I am able to create my own system based on the system template.

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackMage
    4.Lack of unfair competition. I have some ideas and want to tell you about them. Take for example, Microsoft. There are various cases of Microsoft using unfair competition in order to make consumers buy their [I think corporations are referred to in the plural] products. But what does that mean? If corporation executives think that unfair competition is necessary to promote their products, then they aren't sure that their product is better than their competition's. [No even needed] If the main executives aren't sure, how can an ordinary user be sure? Notice the last fact: the open source world doesn't know the term “unfair competition”. These guys just do their work and nothing more. [Again, don't start a sentence with the word 'and'] I like it very much.
    The sentence "I have some ideas and want to tell you about them." serves no purpose. It is obvious.

    4.Lack of fair competition. Take Microsoft for example. There are various cases where Microsoft used deceptive practices to make consumers believe their products were the best. If corporate executives believe that deceptive practices are necessary to promote their products, then they aren't sure that their product is better than their competitors. If the main executives aren't sure, how can an ordinary user be sure? These guys just do their work and nothing more.

    First it should be "Lack of fair competition", secondly, competition cannot be fair/unfair. Maybe you should just say "Lack of competition". The term "unfair competition" does not exist. Maybe "deceptive practices" or "anti-competitive practices" is a better term.
    The last sentence "I like it very much." makes no sense here, unless you are being sarcastic. Sarcasm cannot be expressed in written language.

    Anyway, feel free to shoot me down. These are only my opinions.
    Какая разница, умереть богатым или бедным?

    Какой толк от богатства если ты не счастлив.

  10. #10
    Завсегдатай kalinka_vinnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sunnyvale, Cali
    Posts
    5,771
    Rep Power
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by kwatts59
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackMage
    I want to tell you about the Linux operating system. It's my current operating system and I surely haven't seen anything better!
    There are no grammer erros and it sounds ok, but I think stylistically it would be a little bit better to say the following:

    Introduction.

    I currently use Linux as my operating system and I have to say that I surely have not seen anything better!
    Well, I think this introduction sucks. I mean, you should introduce what you are going to talk about, not make a statement saying it is great!

    Something like (and this comes from years of writing memos)

    This paper (report) explains the reasons why I chose the Linux operating system, which is my current opertaing system and, in my opinion, the best operating system out there. The paper (report) is divided into three parts:

    1. etc.
    2. etc.
    3. etc.
    Hei, rett norsken min og du er død.
    I am a notourriouse misspeller. Be easy on me.
    Пожалуйста! Исправляйте мои глупые ошибки (но оставьте умные)!
    Yo hablo español mejor que tú.
    Trusnse kal'rt eturule sikay!!! ))

Similar Threads

  1. Accented text
    By ronaldM in forum Pronunciation, Speech & Accent
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: September 21st, 2007, 09:06 PM
  2. Text for Pimsleur?
    By TheHopeful in forum Getting Started with Russian
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: December 8th, 2005, 09:48 AM
  3. Old english text
    By Pasha in forum Scandinavian
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 14th, 2005, 02:47 PM
  4. Please help me translate this text
    By ilia in forum Translate This!
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: September 11th, 2005, 01:40 PM
  5. ein Text
    By Indra in forum German
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 5th, 2005, 05:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Russian Lessons                           

Russian Tests and Quizzes            

Russian Vocabulary