I have to prepare a small text about any operating system. Here is what I gave birth to. Could someone read it and correct mistakes?
Introductory.
I want to tell about Linux operating system. It's my current operating system, and I haven't seen anything better, be sure! The plan of my report is:
a) why I choose open source?
b) shortcomings.
c) conclusion
Why I choose open source?
The main thing of open source for me is that I don't have to pay money for software. Moreover, I always can read sources and modify the software I use. It doesn't matter that I maybe won't do it. I can do it, and it's wonderful. For me open source means:
1.Quality. There is a large number of high-qualified developers which do high-quality things. There is no software company which can make such developers community in its offices.
2.Independent. I'm free of marketing strategies of large corporations, no one makes me to buy another version of a “mega-cool program”, no one makes my choice for me.
3.Confidence. I always know what my system do, I am able to tune even very insignificant patterns of my system's behavior. In fact, I am able to make my own system based on the system template which I have.
4.Lack of unfair competition. I have some idea and want to tell you about it. Take, for example, Microsoft. There are various cases when it used unfair competition in order to make users use its products. But what does it mean? If corporation leaders think that unfair competitive struggle is necessary to promote their product, it means that they aren't sure that their product is better than rival's one. But if even the main leaders aren't sure in it, how can an ordinary user be sure? And notice the last fact: open source world doesn't know the term “unfair competition”. These guys just do their work, nothing more. And I like it very much.
Shortcomings.
For me the main shortcoming of free software in general and Linux in particular is that the most part of the world use proprietary software. Open source guys try to make their products compatible with proprietary ones, but corporations try not to tolerate this.
The second and more important (for others, not for me ) shortcoming is that usually open source products demand more qualification of users than proprietary ones. I have tried to install and tune Linux on my PC for six times, and only seven attempt was successful. But now, when I understood the spirit of Linux, tuning of my system became an easy and pleasant deal.
But it's well known fact, that a system can't be secure without qualified users. That means that if the most part of PC users knew more about white boxes they use every day, hackers attacks and viruses epidemics would be far more infrequent. From this point of view demand of qualified users seems not critical shortcoming, but barrier which helps us, Linux users, to protect ourselves from dummies which can destroy our happy world
Conclusion
My own negative experience of word-of-mouth Linux advertising showed me, that each person must come to Linux by himself, without any side advices, and it isn't possible to make people love Linux. But I think everyone must at least try it...