says who?
Because I think it is the second target and the first target is to make a public comment about "poor work" done by governmental structures
That's incorrect
I'm trying to tell that he KNEW in advance that nothing can be proven in that case thus knew the result of investigation and knew that he will be able to pose himself as "a hero fighting corruption while government don't want to do anything"
That's again, incorrect
The only thing which need to be done to start an investigation is an application. There is no need to provide ANY other documents
IDK but my thinking about it will not prove or analyze anything, does it?
Maybe it was the trace of corruption in this case but I'm repeating again, look what he's doing - HE'S TARGET IS NOT A CORRUPTION