Thread: USA government gone rogue (well... not exactly. L.)

Originally Posted by Eric C.

Those 2 are totally unrelated questions (##1 & 2), I just happen to be curious about the answers to both of them. That bold quote #2 doesn't conclude from the first one at all, I agree.

I still can't understand (and therefore i don't know how to reply)

you say

If the answer to question #1 is yes, then
and
Those 2 are totally unrelated questions (##1 & 2)
now your logic is totally beyond my comprehension.

Originally Posted by Alex_krsk

I still can't understand (and therefore i don't know how to reply)

you say

If the answer to question #1 is yes, then
and
Those 2 are totally unrelated questions (##1 & 2)
now your logic is totally beyond my comprehension.

Alright, I'm conditionally interested in the answer to the second question, depending on the answer to the first one. But the questions themselves are unrelated (i.e. "if that's true" and "if that one has any links..."). Make sense now? =))

Originally Posted by Eric C.

Alright, I'm conditionally interested in the answer to the second question, depending on the answer to the first one. Make sense now? =))

No it doesnt. because Strelkov can use whatever experience he wants and is free to announce it in his interviews. And if that is true or not only he knows himself.
But how does that lead you to question #2 i still don't understand.

Originally Posted by Alex_krsk

No it doesnt. because Strelkov can use whatever experience he wants and is free to announce it in his interviews. And if that is true or not only he knows himself.
But how does that lead you to question #2 i still don't understand.

That's because nothing led me to it but my curiosity about that question. =))