Thread: USA government gone rogue (well... not exactly. L.)

Originally Posted by Eric C.

I took this one from your last link (in bold), and that's just mind-blowing! --> juche_songun: Тактика "Тоннельного боя", разработанная Ким Ир Сеном, широко используется войсками ДН

По словам Министра Обороны Донецкой Народной Республики Игоря Ивановича Стрелкова-Гиркина при обороне Семеновки, его войска активно используют опыт Северной Кореи.

I wonder:

1. If that has anything to do with truth in the very first place
2. If the answer to question #1 is yes, then if that separatist chief has any links to the official Russian government
3. If the answers to questions ##1&2 are both yes, how your country can even live with that (I sincerely hope, however, that they aren't both yes)
4. If the answer to question #1 is yes, and regardless of what the answer to question #2 is, if your country still thinks that putting down an armed threat that has records of cooperation with world terrorists from the axis of evil list is a bad idea?...

Now, when i finally stopped loughing, and before i say anything in response to your mind blowing post. Could you kindli answer one question - what logic did you use that would lead you from
По словам Министра Обороны Донецкой Народной Республики Игоря Ивановича Стрелкова-Гиркина при обороне Семеновки, его войска активно используют опыт Северной Кореи.
to
is yes, then if that separatist chief has any links to the official Russian government?

Originally Posted by Alex_krsk

Now, when i finally stopped loughing, and before i say anything in response to your mind blowing post. Could you kindli answer one question - what logic did you use that would lead you from
По словам Министра Обороны Донецкой Народной Республики Игоря Ивановича Стрелкова-Гиркина при обороне Семеновки, его войска активно используют опыт Северной Кореи.
to
is yes, then if that separatist chief has any links to the official Russian government?

Those 2 are totally unrelated questions (##1 & 2), I just happen to be curious about the answers to both of them. That bold quote #2 doesn't conclude from the first one at all, I agree.

Originally Posted by Eric C.

Those 2 are totally unrelated questions (##1 & 2), I just happen to be curious about the answers to both of them. That bold quote #2 doesn't conclude from the first one at all, I agree.

I still can't understand (and therefore i don't know how to reply)

you say

If the answer to question #1 is yes, then
and
Those 2 are totally unrelated questions (##1 & 2)
now your logic is totally beyond my comprehension.

Originally Posted by Alex_krsk

I still can't understand (and therefore i don't know how to reply)

you say

If the answer to question #1 is yes, then
and
Those 2 are totally unrelated questions (##1 & 2)
now your logic is totally beyond my comprehension.

Alright, I'm conditionally interested in the answer to the second question, depending on the answer to the first one. But the questions themselves are unrelated (i.e. "if that's true" and "if that one has any links..."). Make sense now? =))

Originally Posted by Eric C.

Alright, I'm conditionally interested in the answer to the second question, depending on the answer to the first one. Make sense now? =))

No it doesnt. because Strelkov can use whatever experience he wants and is free to announce it in his interviews. And if that is true or not only he knows himself.
But how does that lead you to question #2 i still don't understand.

Originally Posted by Alex_krsk

No it doesnt. because Strelkov can use whatever experience he wants and is free to announce it in his interviews. And if that is true or not only he knows himself.
But how does that lead you to question #2 i still don't understand.

That's because nothing led me to it but my curiosity about that question. =))