View Poll Results: How often does it matter to you when foreigners make mistakes but the text is understandable?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Every time I see/hear it

    4 28.57%
  • Sometimes, when mistakes are too obvious

    8 57.14%
  • When text is interesting, they are less noticeable

    1 7.14%
  • I notice them from time to time

    1 7.14%
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 110

Thread: Perfect English (A question to native English speakers)

  1. #21
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    5,073
    Rep Power
    25
    А на мой вопрос кто-нибудь ответит? Интересно все же, какие ошибки русскоязычных esl learners бросаются в глаза и мешают пониманию больше всего.
    (Извини, Ramil, что в твою тему со своим самоваром. )

  2. #22
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Serving Polonium-flavoured Sake at a London Japanese Restaurant
    Posts
    2,662
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by gRomoZeka
    Can you tell what mistakes of esl learners are more irritating than the others? Or what aspect of the language (word usage, articles, etc.) is more important for making an impression of "perfect english"?
    Like I said, I basically consider the source of the error more annoying than the error itself. Articles, meh. They mark you as a foreigner but I don't think they're that frustrating for a foreigner. Word order could be annoying if it's really out of whack. Using strange words, that is, words that a native speaker would never use in that context could make an argument appear disjointed. I think one of the biggest things, in addition to articles, in terms of frequency is the use of verbs -- a lot of times, that's a marker of a foreigner, since they pick the wrong verbs/forms/constructs. But again, not that "annoying," just somewhat confusing at times.
    Заранее благодарю всех за исправление ошибок в моём русском.

  3. #23
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Serving Polonium-flavoured Sake at a London Japanese Restaurant
    Posts
    2,662
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by basurero
    Кстати, твой английский настолько хорош, что мне было очень трудно найти ошибки.
    Или, может быть твой английский настолько плох, что тебе было очень трудно найти ошибки. Это -- очень философский вопрос с никаким ясным ответом...
    Заранее благодарю всех за исправление ошибок в моём русском.

  4. #24
    Старший оракул
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    On 19 June, 1980
    Posts
    980
    Rep Power
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Бармалей
    Quote Originally Posted by basurero
    Кстати, твой английский настолько хорош, что мне было очень трудно найти ошибки.
    Или, может быть твой английский настолько плох, что тебе было очень трудно найти ошибки. Это -- очень философский вопрос с никаким ясным ответом...
    using philosophical line of reasoning, knowledge of English is relative.
    relative to you, my English is bad, but relative to me, your English is bad

  5. #25
    Властелин
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Invalid City!
    Posts
    1,347
    Rep Power
    16
    In my experience, the last hurdle to English prefection for foreigners is slightly unnatural choice of tense and mood. All those "would have had" and "should have been" and "will have been doing" sentences.

  6. #26
    Moderator Lampada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    СССР -> США
    Posts
    18,025
    Rep Power
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Бармалей
    Quote Originally Posted by basurero
    Кстати, твой английский настолько хорош, что мне было очень трудно найти ошибки.
    Или, может быть, твой английский настолько плох, что тебе было бы очень трудно найти ошибки. Это _ очень философский вопрос, не имеющий ясного ответа...
    "...Важно, чтобы форум оставался местом, объединяющим людей, для которых интересны русский язык и культура. ..." - MasterАdmin (из переписки)



  7. #27
    Властелин charlestonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Local bar
    Posts
    1,477
    Rep Power
    13

    Re: Perfect English (A question to native English speakers)

    ---
    Well, I don't know what to say. I want to say thanks to the Academy, to Mama, to Papa and to my dog. I love you all.

  8. #28
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toto, we're back in Kansas! Oh, Crap!!!
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    13
    I've lived around so many different languages and non-native speakers, and had so many ESL/legal and business students, that for me I can usually understand the meaning and context even if word order, articles, conditionals and other grammar points are wrong. Studying Russian has helped me develop this skill.

    I think the only grammar that catches my attention anymore are "phrasal verbs"... when a foreign speaker thinks that he or she has learned a phrasal verb (usually from an English movie or tv show, which is using "street English"...not "perfect English")...but with the incorrect meaning... and then he or she attempts to use the phrasal verb, usually also with incorrect word order. This, in my opinion is a very difficult hurdle for foreign speakers, who are trying to sound as a native English speaker.

    As a teacher, this problem is difficult to correct in many students.

    By the way... there is no "perfect English"... there are probably 20-25 different variations of English, from the countries and the provinces within the English-speaking countries... but these variations are mainly vocabulary, and colloquial (spoken) differences... with a few minor grammar differences.

    For example... Most American English Professors would not agree that "Oxford English" (the old "standard") is the "correct", or "perfect" English.

    Who speaks "correct", "perfect" Russian? Someone in St. Petersburg? Moscow? Novosibirsk? Vladivostok?

    But... technical or legal documents and contracts, which are what I teach and work with, are very different. No one speaks English in the form or grammar of a legal contract. So... actually... I think "Legal English" is a another variation of English.

    As an attorney, I think that "Legal English" is actually as close to "perfect" English as possible. "Legal English" with includes a mix of Latin words and phrases, is designed to be understand by any English speaking attorney, anywhere, even one thousand years from now. It is designed for "permanent" (or as close to permanent as possible) understanding of the meaning and intention of the document. But, as I said... nobody speaks using this form of English.

    But... 1,000 years from now, who knows? There may be only a few languages remaining... 2 or 3 mixed languages of English/Russian/Chinese/Japanese/Spanish/German/French... these are already developing in our lifetimes... or there may be a new global "common" language.

    More information than you probably wanted, Ramil.

  9. #29
    Властелин
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Invalid City!
    Posts
    1,347
    Rep Power
    16
    I'd describe 'perfect English' as English without any errors.

    English speakers are remarkably tolerant of differences in style, vocabulary etc brought about by geography, to the point where they are completely irrelevant to any discussion of 'perfect English'.

    I do not hear "errors" when I listen to someone from New Zealand, or Canada, or any other English speaking country, I hear differences in style, and I am certain it is the same for them when listening to me. That is a world away from the sort of mistakes foreigners make which jump out of the air like the sound of nails on a blackboard.

  10. #30
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toto, we're back in Kansas! Oh, Crap!!!
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by scotcher
    I'd describe 'perfect English' as English without any errors.

    English speakers are remarkably tolerant of differences in style, vocabulary etc brought about by geography, to the point where they are completely irrelevant to any discussion of 'perfect English'.

    I do not hear "errors" when I listen to someone from New Zealand, or Canada, or any other English speaking country, I hear differences in style, and I am certain it is the same for them when listening to me. That is a world away from the sort of mistakes foreigners make which jump out of the air like the sound of nails on a blackboard.
    There are "errors", as you describe them... but usually in vocabulary, usage and spelling.

    For example... what is the correct spelling... "Center"... or is it "Centre"?

    Minor differences.

    One of my closest friends in Madrid is an excellent Irish ESL teacher, and when he speaks to Americans, he is very difficult to understand... grammar and vocabulary. Many Americans would say he makes many errors, especially in usage. But, in my opinion, he speaks "perfect" Irish English.

    I understand your meaning... differences in style, and not "errors".

    But there are several important differences between British English, and American English. Errors? Or differences in style?

    Which English "style" is the "perfect" English? There are important grammar, usage, vocabulary and spelling differences between the various forms of English.

    A person who learns American English "perfectly", probably cannot pass the British English Proficiency exam. And the same in reverse, for a person who learns British English "perfectly", probably cannot pass an American English Proficiency exam.

    Interestingly... I understand Australian English much easier than British English.

  11. #31
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Serving Polonium-flavoured Sake at a London Japanese Restaurant
    Posts
    2,662
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Dobry
    Quote Originally Posted by scotcher
    I'd describe 'perfect English' as English without any errors.

    English speakers are remarkably tolerant of differences in style, vocabulary etc brought about by geography, to the point where they are completely irrelevant to any discussion of 'perfect English'.

    I do not hear "errors" when I listen to someone from New Zealand, or Canada, or any other English speaking country, I hear differences in style, and I am certain it is the same for them when listening to me. That is a world away from the sort of mistakes foreigners make which jump out of the air like the sound of nails on a blackboard.
    There are "errors", as you describe them... but usually in vocabulary, usage and spelling.

    For example... what is the correct spelling... "Center"... or is it "Centre"?

    Minor differences.

    One of my closest friends in Madrid is an excellent Irish ESL teacher, and when he speaks to Americans, he is very difficult to understand... grammar and vocabulary. Many Americans would say he makes many errors, especially in usage. But, in my opinion, he speaks "perfect" Irish English.

    I understand your meaning... differences in style, and not "errors".

    But there are several important differences between British English, and American English. Errors? Or differences in style?

    Which English "style" is the "perfect" English? There are important grammar, usage, vocabulary and spelling differences between the various forms of English.

    A person who learns American English "perfectly", probably cannot pass the British English Proficiency exam. And the same in reverse, for a person who learns British English "perfectly", probably cannot pass an American English Proficiency exam.

    Interestingly... I understand Australian English much easier than British English.
    I very much doubt that an American wouldn't pass a British exam or vice versa. It's the same bloody language, just with regional variations. It's 99% mutually intelligible. Bob's your uncle? What the heck does that mean? But you certainly know, as some guy from Chicago, that it's just an exasperation. As much as it pains me, I think Scotcher's definition is right on. I may not understand every single word a Brit ever udders, but I certainly understand the overwhelming majority of what he said -- certainly enough to pass your proficency exam. Dom DeLuise, now that's another matter...
    Заранее благодарю всех за исправление ошибок в моём русском.

  12. #32
    Властелин
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Invalid City!
    Posts
    1,347
    Rep Power
    16
    Firstly, you are talking total nonsense Dobry. When an American speaks grammaticaly correct American English, reasonably intelligent people from other parts of the English speaking world do not hear errors, no matter how much the vocabulary, syntax or grammar differs from their own 'standard'. They are speaking 'perfect' English.

    Secondly, it is quite clear from the context what Ramil meant by 'perfect', and your nit-picking over that definition is adding absolutely nothing whatsoever to the discussion.

  13. #33
    Старший оракул
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ukraine
    Posts
    844
    Rep Power
    14
    I'm confused.
    "Legal English" ... is designed to be understand by any English speaking attorney..."
    I don't recognize this constraction (in bold). What is it? Shouldn't it be "understood"?

  14. #34
    Властелин charlestonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Local bar
    Posts
    1,477
    Rep Power
    13
    ---
    Well, I don't know what to say. I want to say thanks to the Academy, to Mama, to Papa and to my dog. I love you all.

  15. #35
    Властелин charlestonian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Local bar
    Posts
    1,477
    Rep Power
    13
    ---
    Well, I don't know what to say. I want to say thanks to the Academy, to Mama, to Papa and to my dog. I love you all.

  16. #36
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    420
    Rep Power
    13
    To the question about how to know whether you're reading a Chinese translator's piece of work...I recommend reading something in English that depends more largely on articles than normal. Plato's Meno, for example. You would have to read it in translation, but I don't think the translator would be Chinese.

  17. #37
    Завсегдатай kalinka_vinnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Sunnyvale, Cali
    Posts
    5,771
    Rep Power
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by E-learner
    I'm confused.
    "Legal English" ... is designed to be understand by any English speaking attorney..."
    I don't recognize this constraction (in bold). What is it? Shouldn't it be "understood"?
    Indeed it should be. I am betting Professor Dobry is kicking himself right now
    Hei, rett norsken min og du er død.
    I am a notourriouse misspeller. Be easy on me.
    Пожалуйста! Исправляйте мои глупые ошибки (но оставьте умные)!
    Yo hablo español mejor que tú.
    Trusnse kal'rt eturule sikay!!! ))

  18. #38
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toto, we're back in Kansas! Oh, Crap!!!
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Бармалей
    I very much doubt that an American wouldn't pass a British exam or vice versa. It's the same bloody language, just with regional variations. It's 99% mutually intelligible. Bob's your uncle? What the heck does that mean? But you certainly know, as some guy from Chicago, that it's just an exasperation. As much as it pains me, I think Scotcher's definition is right on. I may not understand every single word a Brit ever udders, but I certainly understand the overwhelming majority of what he said -- certainly enough to pass your proficency exam. Dom DeLuise, now that's another matter...
    Бармалей,

    I'm not talking about a TEFL exam, to enter and study at University... do you know what the Proficiency Exam is?

    Most English speakers would fail it. It is to professional translators/interpreters and professors, what the Medical Boards, Bar exams or Accounting exams are to doctors, attorneys and accountants.

    It's English at a Ph.D level. I doubt that I could pass it without about 6 months of intensive study.

    For example... if I wanted to teach at MGU as an Academic in Russian and Russian linguistics (senior tenured professor/researcher)... I would need to be able to pass Russia's version of the Proficiency Exam.

    The Proficiency Exam is not about fluency... it's about intimate and extremely detailed knowledge of the grammar, roots, usage, vocabulary, etc... again, at the level of a Ph.D. or simultaneous translator (such as U.N. and diplomatic translators).

    British English does not match American English... trust me, it simply doesn't... there are many significant differences.

  19. #39
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toto, we're back in Kansas! Oh, Crap!!!
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    13
    [quote=kalinka_vinnie]
    Quote Originally Posted by "E-learner":2hrb8fkf
    I'm confused.
    "Legal English" ... is designed to be understand by any English speaking attorney..."
    I don't recognize this constraction (in bold). What is it? Shouldn't it be "understood"?
    Indeed it should be. I am betting Professor Dobry is kicking himself right now [/quote:2hrb8fkf]



    Yep, that was my mistake!!! I was doing three things at once as I wrote this, and I didn't notice. Sorry guys!

  20. #40
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toto, we're back in Kansas! Oh, Crap!!!
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by scotcher
    Firstly, you are talking total nonsense Dobry. When an American speaks grammaticaly correct American English, reasonably intelligent people from other parts of the English speaking world do not hear errors, no matter how much the vocabulary, syntax or grammar differs from their own 'standard'. They are speaking 'perfect' English.

    Secondly, it is quite clear from the context what Ramil meant by 'perfect', and your nit-picking over that definition is adding absolutely nothing whatsoever to the discussion.
    I disagree Scotcher.

    First, YOU don't know what you are saying... there are several grammatical differences between British and American English. Not big differences. And yes, the understanding remains usually clear. But an Oxford professor would want an American exchange student to use Oxford grammar, and would penalize a student for using American grammar. I know this first-hand, because my ex-wife did research work at Oxford for a semester... her professor/tutor/Don often corrected her American grammar, and she was a Ph.D candidate in English literature, from the State Linguistics Institute in Minsk. Her American grammar is "perfect". She comes from a family of diplomatic "simultaneous translators" - Russian/English.

    My own opinion is that there is no such thing as "perfect" English. You are speaking of relatives, not absolutes. When I think of "perfect", I think of absolutes.

    And you didn't answer my question of who speaks "perfect" Russian.

    My point is that all languages are relative, to location, culture, even village-by-village.

    There are many Academics who would say the only "true" or "perfect" Spanish, for example, is the Spanish that is determined by the State Language Institute in Madrid... therefore, most Spaniards don't speak "perfect" Spanish.

    I am NOT saying I agree with this opinion... but I think you are closing your mind to other opinions and thoughts. You first must define exactly what you mean by "error". Then, define exactly what you mean by "perfect".

    If you are in a technical writing class, writing a research paper in Russian... and you write the paper using colloquial (street) Russian, instead of a University level of Russian... do you think your professor will say, "Good job, Scotcher... you wrote in "perfect" Russian! It's "perfect" for the street! Now... get out of my office and write it again!!!" ???

    C'mon Scotcher. Get real.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. For native english speakers
    By strider in forum Penpals and Language Exchange
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 17th, 2010, 08:05 PM
  2. Russians are looking for native speakers of the English lang
    By star-boy in forum Penpals and Language Exchange
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 19th, 2009, 05:48 PM
  3. Native English Speakers: Please Help in Experiment
    By Rtyom in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 5th, 2006, 12:06 PM
  4. for english native speakers
    By ererina in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: August 22nd, 2006, 04:30 PM
  5. Looking for English native speakers
    By yankee in forum Penpals and Language Exchange
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: May 27th, 2005, 03:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Russian Lessons                           

Russian Tests and Quizzes            

Russian Vocabulary