Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 100

Thread: Article or no article

  1. #41
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    с. Хреновое Воронежской обл.
    Posts
    2,481
    Rep Power
    17
    I also never say "whom" and I'm unsure when to use it. You use it like "wem" in German, don't you? So basically "with whom/to whom" but "who did he kill" and not "whom did he kill"?

    I've never heard anyone around this area say "whom" either. But we are rather uneducated down here.

  2. #42
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the land of cheese and murder
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Jasper May
    I never say 'whom', my family never says 'whom', no-one I know ever says 'whom'. Appears I live in rather anti-intellectual surroundings.

    Btw, Lindzi, would you say 'WHOM did he give genital herpes?' in normal speech?
    That's the funny thing - I automatically use it after a preposition, so if it was "he gave genital herpes to whom?" I would defnitely use it. But your construction, I'm not sure. Now that I'm thinking about it, I can't figure out whether I'd automatically say it or not. Hmm.

    But yeah, I do use "whom" in normal, unaffected speech, albeit possibly not every time it is called for grammatically. As do quite a few people I know, now I that I think on it. My friend Jess definitely does. My dad does.

    Both of whom are of German families, now that I think about it. Is there a parallel construction in German that would incline someone raised with German to properly use "who" and "whom"?

  3. #43
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the land of cheese and murder
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    14

  4. #44
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Амстелвэйн, Нидерланды
    Posts
    658
    Rep Power
    14
    So according to that article, my construction would be the correct thing to say (as would 'whom did he kill'). But since it sounds unnatural and forced (who decides that?) it isn't used that often.
    Army Anti-Strapjes
    Nay, mats jar tripes
    Jasper is my Tartan
    I am a trans-Jert spy
    Jerpty Samaritans
    Pijams are tyrants
    Jana Sperm Tit Arsy

  5. #45
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    с. Хреновое Воронежской обл.
    Posts
    2,481
    Rep Power
    17
    DUDE! So you use it as a direct object too? So it's basically a non-nominative "who" then! Hah! I learned something new about English today!

    Quote Originally Posted by Линдзи
    Both of whom are of German families, now that I think about it. Is there a parallel construction in German that would incline someone raised with German to properly use "who" and "whom"?
    Yeah, it's "wem" or "wen." At first I thought it was only "wem" but now that I know it's used for D.O. too, then also "wen." Ex:

    Wer hat das Buch bekommen?
    Who received the book?
    Wem hast du das Buch gegeben?
    Whom did you give the book to?(or maybe "To whom did you give the book"? My English sucks).
    Wen hast du mit dem Buch geschlagen?
    Whom did you hit with the book?

    This is SO COOL! I'm using "whom"! YES!

    But don't you think this sounds kind of weird? "Whom are you with?"

  6. #46
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the land of cheese and murder
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Pravit
    But don't you think this sounds kind of weird? "Whom are you with?"
    It sounds wrong because prepositions then cannot go at the end of sentences. I would say "You are with whom?" See? Normal.

  7. #47
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Амстелвэйн, Нидерланды
    Posts
    658
    Rep Power
    14
    Esattamente. Now I'm not going to say that prepositions can't ever be used at the end of a sentence, clause, whatever, but 'whom', when used with a preposition, has to be preceded by that preposition. Or that's what I think.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pravit
    Whom did you give the book to?(or maybe "To whom did you give the book"? My English sucks)
    What about "Whom did you give the book?"
    Army Anti-Strapjes
    Nay, mats jar tripes
    Jasper is my Tartan
    I am a trans-Jert spy
    Jerpty Samaritans
    Pijams are tyrants
    Jana Sperm Tit Arsy

  8. #48
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    с. Хреновое Воронежской обл.
    Posts
    2,481
    Rep Power
    17
    Damn, my English has become quite sucky! And they say you know your language better after learning other ones...balderdash! Or, as I like to say, "Codswobble!"

  9. #49
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the land of cheese and murder
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Jasper May
    Esattamente. Now I'm not going to say that prepositions can't ever be used at the end of a sentence, clause, whatever, but 'whom', when used with a preposition, has to be preceded by that preposition. Or that's what I think.

    Quote Originally Posted by Pravit
    Whom did you give the book to?(or maybe "To whom did you give the book"? My English sucks)
    What about "Whom did you give the book?"
    Indeed. I have no major quibble with "Who did you give the book?" or even "Who did you give the book to?" in conversation, although I do think the correct variant with "whom" is more pleasing to the ear. But if you are going to use whom, it must accompany its preposition.

    I would venture that "To whom did you give the book" is not exactly incorrect, but Jasper's "whom did you give the book" is a vastly preferable option; "You gave the book to whom?" would also be nice, in certain contexts.

    And I do think that "whom" is an absolute necessity in an sort of formal writing. There are any number of things that I will say in casual conversation or when, for example, posting on a message board, that I would never put in a document meant for publication or formal interaction. Improper use of who/whom is one of those things. It just looks sloppy. And like it or not, your writing DOES give an impression about you.

  10. #50
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the land of cheese and murder
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Pravit
    Damn, my English has become quite sucky! And they say you know your language better after learning other ones...balderdash! Or, as I like to say, "Codswobble!"
    Pravit, your English is fine. Jeeeeeez.

    And your punctuation is divine. I do appreciate some good punctuation, and you, my good sir, have it in spades.

  11. #51
    Завсегдатай
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    с. Хреновое Воронежской обл.
    Posts
    2,481
    Rep Power
    17
    Oh, I'm flattered! But be a love, dear cousin, and explain to me if the comma must really ALWAYS go inside the quotation marks! I would pull out some old English essays if I could, but I believe I schmeissed them all weg in a bit of jubilee that I finished school. Perhaps when you're listing things that need to go in quotation marks, or the sentence dictates a comma when you're quoting something?

  12. #52
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Амстелвэйн, Нидерланды
    Posts
    658
    Rep Power
    14
    Oo, I do love the word "codswobble", I do. (Do I sound like a Northern granny like this?)
    Army Anti-Strapjes
    Nay, mats jar tripes
    Jasper is my Tartan
    I am a trans-Jert spy
    Jerpty Samaritans
    Pijams are tyrants
    Jana Sperm Tit Arsy

  13. #53
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    413
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Oddo
    surely you must have nothing useful to do in life.
    Splendid. Finally we agree on something.
    А если отнять еще одну?

  14. #54
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    aequidistant
    Posts
    676
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Pravit
    But don't you think this sounds kind of weird? "Whom are you with?"
    Depends on whom you ask about it.
    Jonesboro, Arkansas. Mean, stupid, violent fat people, no jobs, nothing to do, hotter than a dog with 2 d--cks.

  15. #55
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Англия
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Линдзи
    I would daresay you are posting about this far too much to accuse someone ELSE of caring too much about grammar.
    @ Lindzi
    I don't deny you have a point. but I don't care about grammar. If it doesn't seem natural, there's no point losing sleep over it.

    @ the others
    Regarding "whom", don't worry when to use it, if you're not sure just use "who", it's not a big deal. If you're writing an English essay try to use "whom" though.
    Эдмунд Ричардович Вудфилд

  16. #56
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Россия, РТ
    Posts
    572
    Rep Power
    15
    What of this can be considered proper or improper:

    Whom are you talking with?
    Who are you talking with?
    Whom are you talking to?
    Who are you talking to?

  17. #57
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the land of cheese and murder
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Tu-160
    What of this can be considered proper or improper:

    Whom are you talking with?
    Who are you talking with?
    Whom are you talking to?
    Who are you talking to?
    "Who are you talking with" and "Who are you talking to" are both conversational although technically unsound. Correct variants would be "To whom are you talking?" "You are talking to whom?" "With whom are you talking?" and "You're talking with whom?" The preposition and the "whom" must go together.

  18. #58
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the land of cheese and murder
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by Oddo
    @ the others
    Regarding "whom", don't worry when to use it, if you're not sure just use "who", it's not a big deal. If you're writing an English essay try to use "whom" though.
    Yeah, and, like, if you can't remember how to properly use commas, just forget 'em. For real, just do whatever you feel like doing. And don't bother to spell anything correctly, either. And by all means, mix up the word "its" and "it's." Who can be expected to keep all that straight? It's not a big deal. Oddo doesn't care, so no employer or professor ever will.

  19. #59
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Англия
    Posts
    178
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Линдзи
    Quote Originally Posted by Oddo
    @ the others
    Regarding "whom", don't worry when to use it, if you're not sure just use "who", it's not a big deal. If you're writing an English essay try to use "whom" though.
    Yeah, and, like, if you can't remember how to properly use commas, just forget 'em. For real, just do whatever you feel like doing. And don't bother to spell anything correctly, either. And by all means, mix up the word "its" and "it's." Who can be expected to keep all that straight? It's not a big deal. Oddo doesn't care, so no employer or professor ever will.
    Oh, pardon me:

    ...when to use it; if you're...

    Correct spelling and "it's" and "its" serve a useful purpose. Commas aren't quite as important; if you use them too much (i.e. when not necessary) then it doesn't make it hard to understand, whereas too few commas make a sentence unreadable.

    If you could be bothered to read my post, you might notice that I said
    "If you're writing an English essay try to use "whom" though."

    In case any non-natives are wondering, I mean that as an example, not the only time when it's worth using "whom".
    Эдмунд Ричардович Вудфилд

  20. #60
    Почтенный гражданин
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    the land of cheese and murder
    Posts
    663
    Rep Power
    14
    This just in, guys: commas aren't that important.

    What is important about commas is not, in fact, PROPERLY using them, but how much you use them. Use them moderately. If you think you have too many in a sentence, take a few out. If you've got a sentence with none in, stick a few in. It's all about the numbers.

    Oddo, would you care to tell us how many commas per word (CPW) are approprate in a text? I would hate to overuse or underuse the poor comma. Here all along I've been putting them where they were called for by the rules of punctuation, but I'll be sure to stop that immediately.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Definite article use
    By Ленивец in forum Learn English - Грамматика, переводы, словарный запас
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: December 2nd, 2009, 06:18 PM
  2. Article in HELLO
    By SoeurSourire in forum Translate This!
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: October 22nd, 2007, 07:28 AM
  3. Article Proofread
    By Yazeed in forum Grammar and Vocabulary
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: March 20th, 2007, 01:07 PM
  4. Awfully stupid article
    By Bisquit in forum Politics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: June 9th, 2006, 07:34 AM
  5. The other article
    By Dogboy182 in forum Learn English - Грамматика, переводы, словарный запас
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: November 14th, 2003, 12:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Russian Lessons                           

Russian Tests and Quizzes            

Russian Vocabulary