Quote Originally Posted by it-ogo View Post
Well, you don't really follow the situation, don't you? The government is temporary, not elected, the elections are coming soon, Julia don't enter the temporary government and there is no way in contemporary Ukraine to be poor and independent in the same time. It is still to be made.

You feel ready for conclusions?

BTW if you don't accept legitimity of even moderately rich people and money-consuming elections, than you should not accept legitimity of any USA president.
Bullshit. I think what Hanna quotes is right, in this case. I read the same info from RT. I don't trust it fully as a source but the facts are these Ukrainian 'businessmen' are more of the same. They have a Jewish central banker as interim PM. Do you think these personnel in the Government will change much after an 'election?' Didn't you listen to the Nuland recording? They already decided who they want or don't care for (i.e. smaller governor or other appointee positions that are insignificant to them). Then, they pacify the electorate with 15-30 or whatever amount they choose-billion dollar IMF loan and promises of jobs and BS, BS and more BS.... same shit as before but a different pile.

I'm very disappointed that Ukrainians haven't seen through this but I guess when you are already oppressed and are poor for a long time, it's easy to turn screws and manipulate things.

"BTW if you don't accept legitimity of even moderately rich people and money-consuming elections, than you should not accept legitimity of any USA president."
Many Americans know there is a problem about that. Also, they often criticize lobbies and other intrusive operations. So, that is the point. This is going to be yet another corrupt and shady 'democracy.' Ukraine is not independent, STILL.