Well, some people like Ramil would say that the only adequate penalty for killing is the death sentence. So, according to those, a bit fun Nelson Mandela did not have enough suffering.Originally Posted by Misha Tal
No he hadn't, because his enemies do not use mosques to pray. But, I agree with you, Mahmoud Abbas was not as ruthless killer as Yassir Araft. That's why Mahmoud Abbas didn't get the Nobel Peace Prize, unlike Yassir Arafat.Originally Posted by Misha Tal
Ok, got you, so shall we torture Mahmoud Abbas? There are lots of suicide bombings in his world, aren't they?Originally Posted by Misha Tal
Uhm, what's bad in a cause "improve conditions for ethnic Baluchis" and "fighting exclusively for the rights of Sunni Muslims in Iran?"Originally Posted by Misha Tal
But, he was most likely tortured!! So, his 'confession' does not worth a dime! That's how the Iranian officials want to portray the Jundullah. You can't really draw any conclusions based on his 'confessions'.Originally Posted by Misha Tal
Yes, it was. Russian elections are also democratic. There's so much interest in the elections that in some electoral districts the participation is more than 100% of voters.Originally Posted by Misha Tal
What about the other leaders? Why can't you say that about Yassir Arafat? Or Nelson Mandela? Or, perhaps, Fidel Castro wanted to kill and torture people so much so that he took advantage of the working class fellows, used some demagogy and made that whole heroic 'revolution' thing? Do you know how many people [a bit fun] Fidel Castro have killed? The poor Rigi guy is no match for that revolutionary giant who [presumably] wanted a lot of social justice. How can you really make a difference?Originally Posted by Misha Tal