Originally Posted by
UhOhXplode The results of the police investigation in Odessa:
All the victims were Ukrainian citizens.
All the victims were unarmed.
Most of the victims were 40-60 years old.
They only occupied the Trade Union building to seek shelter from the attacks of the Right Sector militia. The survivors were beaten with sticks and chains.
I'm still watching and waiting for the US to issue a strong condemnation of the massacre in Odessa. I'm only giving them till midnight, tonight. If they don't issue a strong condemnation for the massacre, then I'll be forced to conclude that they are the same as the animals that slaughtered those people.
It reminds me of what I read in American history - the invasion of the Indian nations and the massacres of the Indian people to create a new nation. And that happened less than 240 years ago - about the same time that Crimea became part of Russia under Catherine the Great. Have you ever read "Trail of Tears"? I talked to an American Indian and he told me that someday they would take their country back. And don't forget, the Mexican people still want California back. They've planted Mexican flags all over that state.
Oh, and you can add Hawaii to that list. It was taken out by a US military coup and the native Hawaiians want their land and government back too. The only response from the US was an official apology for stealing their island nation.
Tbh, I think America has more issues about controlling other country's land than Russia ever will.
I read a lot of the history of Ukraine (980's - 2014) when I was studying Russian history. The only times that Ukraine had a stable government was when it was occupied by another country (Russia, Poland-Lithuania, Austria, etc). They did setup 4 or 5 States on Ukrainian territory during the Bolshevik period but in every case they fell into chaos and anarchy. And what's happened since 1990 doesn't convince me that they can succeed. The word "Ukraine" means "borderland" and I think that's very appropriate.
Also, nobody could have explained it better than Basil77. It's not about official borders, it's about compatriots. I also read about the Baltic snowflakes, Russian southeastern Ukraine, Belarus, and northern Kazakhstan. Even the President of Belarus said that without Russian, Belarus would cease to exist. The only important borders are Russia and Russian compatriots. When foreigners attack the compatriots they are attacking Russia.
Special note - I consider the Russian media to be just as valid as the Western media (likely more valid in some ways). The only reason I link so much Western media is to appease pro-West members.
I hope the crisis can be resolved diplomatically but considering the attitudes of the interim government, the US, and the EU, sometimes I seriously doubt that it can. As always in history, Ukraine is falling again into chaos and anarchy. And it just proves that the US and the EU aren't able to create a stable government... except maybe a severely authoritarian dictatorship (disguised as a democracy) to rule the people by force. Does it remind anyone of Iraq? Saddam Hussein and the interim President probably have a lot in common. He led the Al-Anfal campaign and Yatsenyuk is leading the anti-Russian campaign. The real difference is that Hussein was sentenced to death for what he did.
Also, the US is supporting Yatsenyuk's anti-Russian campaign... against Ukrainian citizens. So the interim government, imo, totally is a Nazi organization.