Quote Originally Posted by Friendy
Let's take any two different persons A and B, HR ideology says that the rights of A are justified as long as they don't contradict to B's rights and vice versa. That is the basics of human rights ideology.
... which only works so long as there are exactly A and B and nobody else. As soon as there is C, it becomes tricky. And it becomes a joke when there are 150 millions of those not contradicting one another and 10 thousands who want it the other way around.

Not to say that the term "the right of peoples" is a rather vague thing, and it's certainly not a basic human right (at least because when one speaks about the right of a person it's clear what is meant but when one speaks about the right of the group of people it requires more assumptions and explanations).
Basic or not, it is just more significant than the right of one person. I'm simply stating a fact of life here, not a communists or socialist doctrine. The will of a people (or a group large enough) always has implications far surpassing those of a will of a single person. But the "human rights" doctrine simply denies the entire concept and is unable to deal with the reality of this world in its entirety. It may work in societies which have already reached harmony (such as the EU), but it simply breaks down under more severe conditions.