Thread: Some military sentences..

There are no words about nuclear subs in the memoirs of veterans. They say only about a nuclear aircraft carrier. Further the author discuss modern military conditions, that they should add to aircraft carriers a multipurpose submarine to discover enemies more effectively.
Successfully carry out TRAINING torpedo attacks means that it was just successful military exersises and maneuvers in the guarded area but not the real attacks.

ok this is from the topic about MiG not winning the MMRCA India share of modern aeroplanes...
The following para needs attention:

Это, в общем, ничего, что ни тот ни другой из претендентов до сих пор не имеет в серийном производстве того, что Россия и США выкатывают по первому требованию, например тех же самых радаров с АФАР. Судя по всему, и Париж, и Лондон что-то пообещали Дели, причем довольно много и убедительно. Как нетрудно догадаться, продать несуществующую пока вещь удается только за дополнительные уступки.

The bold part is confusing:
This, in general, anything that neither one nor the other of the candidates are still not in mass production that Russia and the U.S. are rolling out at short notice, for example, the same radar with AFAR. Apparently, and Paris and London that have pledged Delhi, and quite a lot and convincingly. As you might guess, sell non-existent until the thing can only further concessions.


The author signifies that only Russia/US has the mass-production capability with respect to RADARS...but what he says about London/Paris I can't get?