Thread: Yeah! Asteroids, baby! :)

Originally Posted by Crocodile

I'm not sure what makes you so irritated about point 1, isn't that the natural process that had happen everywhere?

It suggests that both sides should spend resources on learning the language of the opposite side. I found this economically unnecessary.

Originally Posted by Doomer

It suggests that both sides should spend resources on learning the language of the opposite side. I found this economically unnecessary.

I agree. That's why I think options 2 and 3 (which I personally endorse) are equally good from the economic perspective. However, moving forward from point 1 requires some coordination of efforts, won't you agree? I mean, in my example, if both French and Kaluli would speak, say, Portuguese, it would enormously speed up the business integration, but what would make them both learn Portuguese?