I do agree with what you said (at least with what I understand) But we are talking on different levels. I on very or most global, you on more specific (because you see I'm no good at that - I know little facts or just have few data). I think bad aspects of globalization are temporary or provisional. They're casued by the natural process of adaptation. It's like disinfection with stamping out. Very painful, but you kills all the microbes.
I would prefer to see more "international culture" (Esperanto and the related culture) and less one specific culture (US pop culture that is) destroying other national cultures
That's because all the countries are like different species of animals: It's those who are stronger who survive. We're all enemies and rivals and each of us wants to get as more as possibble of all the things in the world. But we should be allies, who help each other mutually beneficially.
As to Esperanto. You would prefer Esperanto be the international language instead of Egnlish, so that no culture was offended?