Your response is typical for one who has no answers. This is the response you should have given in the very first place instead of even attempting to debate seriously

This thread started when Pravitt questioned the media coverage on the pope's funeral. He was attacked for doing so, apparently because the pope is considered by so many to be "untouchable". That is when I took it upon myself to show that not only is he fallible and therefore "touchable", he deserves to be attacked.