Well. I wanted to be constructive. And I wanted to clarify open questions without insulting anyone. So I suggested the form of specific questions and answers (my post RT coverage on gay rights in Russia). I clearly formulated the questions, some of them are very simple, just "yes-no" questions. None of my questions contained any personal accusation.

Some people may not like my analogies I provided to make my point clearer. I explicitely apologized for some crudity they contain. Although they did not contain any personal insult directed to any specific participant. I just HAD to provide them to show the whole topic is as obscene as my examples are.

However, some persons accused me in being "pejorative", in "attacking" them, instead of clarifying their position in a constructive manner. That's all what I got in exchange. It is like "everything you do is BAD just because it is BAD, no logic accepted".

What should I do now? I have to sum up the idea I tried to convey. And leave the discussion forever.

Summary:
1. There is no law which prosecutes gays for being a gay. It does not exist.
2. There is a law which prevents minors from being inveigled into any non-traditional sexual behavior. So, the law prohibits promotion of the non-traditional relationships to minors. That's how it is written there. It does not explicitly specify gays, lesbians and other sorts of that behavior.
3. There is absolutely no reason for any gay guest of the Olympics to be arrested or punished, if they are not involved into the activity of Item 2. Please read item 2 carefully prior to judging.
4. If there are many people in the U.S. who are seriously concerned by the possibility that some athletes, journalists etc. can be punished at the Olympics, it only means one thing: the U.S. mass media are deliberately lying to them. So, they do not explain what this law is about. Instead of telling the truth, they feed up the hysteria by calling it "anti-gay law".
5. In addition to what is stated above, there is no reasonable way how we can even know about someone's orientation. No one is going to ask anyone "Are you a gay?" That is not even supposed to happen. It is a private thing, and the majority of people here do respect private life, they are not interested in intervening it.
It is the U.S. where a public discussion of someone's pregnancy (as I heard of it) can be a norm. But here even pregnancy is not an appropriate thing to be discussed publically, not to mention someone's orientation.

No issue exists.

That's all I wanted to say. I have nothing to add more. And I am quitting this discussion now. Who wants to accept the logic, they will. Otherwise it is absolutely useless to keep arguing. No more posts will be made here ever.