Thread: War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Hehe

Originally Posted by Friendy

Originally Posted by TriggerHappyJack

Oh, what a cutie. I adore it already.

That's Jigglypuff.

He's the middle in a series of evolutions, starting at the wonderful Igglybuff!

Igglybuff



Evolves into Jigglypuff



Who in turn evolves into Wigglytuff

Attack to London in a threshold of the summit of the G8,
has broken a new wave of democratic colonization,
has strengthened anticolonial resistance
and became significant event in struggle
with the international nazism and profascism.

The reason of terrorism in London.
Democracy in England is constructed on the basis of totalitarian
control over the person. Therefore the society supports
state policy and is out of internal political problems. Such society is used
by the government for promotion of colonization and development of Mother country.
It is not possible to defend antifascist and anticolonial opinions
in such system.

Terrorists who attacked London and terrorists which work under covering of London in their countries - are people with different points of view.
Terrorists who are supported by London are armed democrats in their native land, they are helpers to
London in it's democratic colonization, a treacherous column. London supports dissidents specially
to destroy other states and colonize them.
These invited democrats regret about happened attacks to London directed
against democratic colonization of developing countries and the countries of the third world.

Rigid administrative selection of persons who define a policy of the state, and ideas discussed in a society. For realization of these problems the society and its citizens are controled.
In a totalitarian society there can not be equal rights for citizens, that we can see on an example of structure of authority in England.

Ideology of terrorism is the anticolonialism.
Against what ideology English government struggles?
And what ideology advances?
May be colonialism? Iraq?

Originally Posted by saibot

That's Jigglypuff.

He's the middle in a series of evolutions, starting at the wonderful Igglybuff!

Igglybuff

Evolves into Jigglypuff

Who in turn evolves into Wigglytuff

Wow! That's cute.

I think, that the terrorism in England is connected with occupation of Iraq,
and London does not wish to disengage armies because it is possible to get a loss of profit for the English companies in Iraq.
Whether war will have been thrown to the territory of England?

With falling of English ideology of military colonization in Germany (in 1945) and with growth of national-liberation movements, distribution of ideology of democratic colonization had become an answer to the challenge of the epoch. U.Cherchill was the founder of the international development of idea. The essence of the idea consisted in creation of democratic elections on the basis of interests of colonialists. Financial resources and the advanced political technologies provided visibility of the democratic elections and a victory of representatives of colonialists. Now the erroneousness of Cherchill's idea as a tool for suppression of anticolonialism is obvious on an example of civil and emancipating wars in Iraq. But the English government won't be able to put U.Cherchill to prison, he has died.

Originally Posted by Friendy

Originally Posted by saibot

That's Jigglypuff.

He's the middle in a series of evolutions, starting at the wonderful Igglybuff!

Igglybuff

Evolves into Jigglypuff

Who in turn evolves into Wigglytuff

Wow! That's cute.

Hahaha! I can't believe I never checked this! Igglybuff isn't hardcore! In the orginal game there was only Jigglypuff and Wigglytuff, then they made "baby" Pokemon. So not cool. Only the retro ones are. Hahaha. I can't believe I threw away all my pokemon stuff from when I was little. That stuff is hardcore. <- Wearing his Pokemon shirt today. Heehee.

Originally Posted by Oleg281

I think, that the terrorism in England is connected with occupation of Iraq,
and London does not wish to disengage armies

I think that the question here is: How may Iraqis want a Taliban style government? If the coalition pulls out now that is what they will have.

hmm... DDT vs Duracell/Energizer Bunny Oleg281

I wonder who will win?

Some how I don't think that Mr. Bunny will want to respond in a linear manner.

Englishmen have been put into frameworks of support of a struggle of colonialists,
it is also democracy. It is the democracy refined from reality.
The government of colonialists spreads nazism in a society,
having delegated to the England the maximum right - to define destiny of people.

In front of London there is a question: system democracy for the sake of safety
in the interests of colonialists, or freedom in the interests of people and releasing
occupied countries from democratic colonization.

US government reflects with an interest
about what will be in London, the center of world ideology?
In fact if London fall, it will be necessary to change the policy.

See? What did I tell ya?

England which made so much for nazism, has remained out of work after occupation of the Europe by nazis. Hitler not only ignored interests of England but also "put to the place" his neighbour. To Hitler it was enough, and further - to the East.
There was no second front. The England-American front was urgently opened and question about repartition of the Europe was rised then.

Hitler's policy was based on
political views of London in many respects. Hitler headed a policy of colonization.
So " the policy of pacification" actually was a policy of the consent with
Hitler's actions, but it was replaced by policy of treachery to Hitler after, though
ideological views of London have not changed.

Iraq (2002) was disarmed and was ready to cooperate with the United Nations, S.Husejn was deceived, now terrorists protect the country from democratic colonialists.

Anyone else think this bozo is posting through an online translator?

1. The economy of Germany after defeat in the First World war was completely under the control of the English capital (reparation, credits).
By 1932 Englishmen did not know what is more favourably for England - credits or reparations, and democratic elections passed under the control of the English capital.
2. Hitler has won democratic elections owing to support of London.
Money come also directly from abroad: English oil king Deterding, a friend of Hoffmann and Rehberg, supplied Hitler with currency on a regular basis (he gave 10 million of dutch guldens once).
3 England never consider seriously to Hitler. Hitler was a hope as a force which is capable to control people.
4 When war began? Was Czechoslovakia occupied after partition of Poland? England initiated war.
5 Hitler was not going to occupy England. Hitler understood, that England is the leading colonial power, and England understood that there must be no friends in war for colonies.
Military actions against England had inconsistent character.
Luftvaffe never undertook concentrated attacks to the British radar stations, and they had huge value for defense of the country. Hitler counted, that having transferred bombardments on cities of England he will compel London to go for negotiations. Negotiations about what?
6. The second front was conducted in Africa in trying to solve colonial problems.
Only people's liberation movements and USSR battled against colonialism. For England the main thing was preservation of owned colonies and repartition of the Europe.
7. 60 million person was lost because of a colonial policy of England which come to deadlock.

Haha.

So WW2 was all England's fault? Is that what you are saying?

As a Scot, I like where you are going with this

Advanced Tactical Bot?

Falling of pro-English authority in democratic
protectorates approaches falling of authority in mother country.

In the English society where there is a leadership of mercenary interests
and concentration of authority at financial circles,
colonialists represent safety from acts of terrorism
as the basic condition of preservation of their democracy.
Safety is provided by indifference to colonized
people, unauthenticity of the information, neutralization of opposition,
development of political apathy in a society, the statement of fear for the life.