Well, technically, I made no such commitment. What I said was "I've argued only with what you have written in this here thread", which is in the past tense.
But I take your point all the same. Yes, I was snippy.
That wasn't directed at Americans in general. It was directed at the specific set of Americans who hold equivalent views to the group of flag-waiving, history-whitewashing fellow Brits I was insultingAnd as an American, I took issue with:
"mouth-breathing counterparts"
As it happens, I like Hanna too, I just find her insistence on responding to my points not with counterpoints, but with insinuations based on my nationality, to be extremely tedious. I don't think I've really left her anywhere to go with that now though, so we'll see how it goes eh?Over and above that: I like Hanna, and despite the fact that we often disagree, she's proven herself in the past to be a skilled, interesting, and largely polite debater. In sharp contrast, in your text I felt that I was receiving far less of your interpretations of the sociopolitical landscape in your post, and far more of a bolus dose of a pied angst; whether it's political angst in general, or a response to how you feel you were treated in the above posts, I can't suss out. But if I were to hazard a guess, I'd say, maybe you were mad. I'd like to see what you can do on this topic sans ire; I'd be interested in reading it.



10Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote
