Sweden's citizens were boasted by TIME magazine in the summer of 2002 as of having the second highest quality of life in the whole world.
Okay well maybe not *boasted* (it was only a chart).
But the point has been made.
And well from reading Francis Strand's well known blog with rich descriptions of life in Sweden, it seems a perfectly fine place to live, lets consider the other options...

I can live in Egypt, and be sentenced to a prison sentence doing hard labor for 40 years (ala the trials of the men arrested on the floating nightclub on the Nile last year.)
I can live in err Wyoming or Texas and be dragged by 2 rednecks in a pickup truck and then beaten to death and left to die on a fence (ala Mathew Shepard).

Take a compliment, your countrys a good place to live.

Oh and accordingly there is a subtle difference to the synonyms of liberty and freedom (not that I actually paid attention to this at the time, im just typing it tp combat your irrelevent snappy comment that had no place within your response but to be rude.)

here is the quote from the American Heritage Dictionary of The English Language:

Freedom is the most general term: “In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free” (Abraham Lincoln). Liberty stresses the power of free choice: “liberty, perfect liberty, to think, feel, do just as one pleases” (William Hazlitt). License sometimes denotes deliberate deviation from normally applicable rules or practices to achieve a desired effect: poetic license. Frequently, though, it denotes undue freedom: “the intolerable license with which the newspapers break... the rules of decorum” (Edmund Burke).
So as you can see each of these examples expresses the concept of freedom in a different way. So even though freedom, liberty, and license can all be used to express the same series of thought, they carry precise undertones of meaning.
But I suppose it is rather useless to use two in the same sentence, oh well just wanted to point out there is a different nuance to each.