I don't buy the premise of your argument, but even if it were true and not total bigoted BS, people are not responsible legally nor morally for the crimes of their ancestors. To say that they are is to delve into complete and utter ridiculousness. My dad's family is German; am I to try to atone for WWII? Especially when you throw in the fact that my grandparents and great-grandparents weren't even Nazis? I'm going with "no" on this one. My responsibility, as the rest of the world's responsibility, is only to learn from the tragedies of the past and fight not to repeat them. If your grandfather robbed my grandfather, are you supposed to go to jail for it?

I realize no amount of REALITY is going to convince you that the crimes of the Soviet Union are not some evil Jewish plot (I suppose it does NO good whatsoever to point out that neither Lenin nor Stalin were Jewish? Or even that Stalin was a Christian theology student before going into politics?) but I am curious what twist in your mind suggests that Jewish people should be expected to atone for ancestral crimes, but not other ethnic/religious groups. Why only Jewish people in Russia? Why not expect all Europeans in the Americas to give up all property to Native Americans, to make up for the systematic exermination of many tribes? Or all Japanese people living in China to give up all property to the Chinese, to make up for Nanking?

And once again, not to pick nits, but I don't think you understand the word "genocide." Genocide is the systematic effort to wipe out a race or ethnic group. I can come up with no historian who would suggest that the Soviet Union, even at the height of any terror, was attempting to wipe out Russians. You can make a case for genocide in the case of some of the non-Russian ethnic groups that Stalin dislocated, but certainly not in the case of ethnic Russians. Genocide is mass murder, but mass murder is not always genocide. The Communist campaign against the Orthodox church is also not an example of genocide. It is an example of repression, often using techniques of terror. An effort to exterminate a religion is not necessarily an effort to exterminate all members of that faith; the idea was to stop people from practicing and propagating the religion, not to kill anyone who had ever crossed him or herself.

Your argument makes no sense on any level. I suggest that you consider long and hard the prejudices and lapses in logic that have led you to this conclusion.