Thread: Colloquial (?) structure I don't quite get

I have found a nother example for a similar structure in the novel Дневной дозор, which is probably nothing a native speaker would think twice about but which is, as far as I see it, impossible to parse for a native speaker of German or English. Without the explanation in the previous posts I would not get it. The context is that a girl asks a witch to make her runaway lover come back, and the witch says:

Вернуть - вернёт, но удержать - не удержит.

A literal translation is impossible, but the meaning is something like "Bring him back, that's possible, but keep him (or: make him stay), no."

There is no end of such seemingly small ways of expressing things which are enormously difficult for a learner to figure out without the help of a native speaker, but they never turn up in grammar books or the like.

"Поднять - подняли, а разбудить забыли."

Originally Posted by Crocodile

"Поднять - подняли, а разбудить забыли."

Haha! To help others remember the patterns I recommend to come up with more funny or weird phrases like that

Искать - искали, найти - не нашли.

Originally Posted by Crocodile

"Поднять - подняли, а разбудить забыли."

Здесь поднять значит подняли с постели/кровати, заставили встать с постели/кровати.

Originally Posted by bitpicker

Вернуть - вернёт, но удержать - не удержит.

The meaning is "He will take it back, that's possible, but he won't manage to keep it."

The way you tranlated it will be Вернуть [его] - вернём, но удержать [его] - не удержим.

Trouble is that this does not fit the context at all. The sequence is about bringing the guy back by magic, but to keep him from leaving again, more magic is needed.

You can find it here: Дневной дозор (fb2) | Либрусек

It's in the prologue.

Originally Posted by bitpicker

Trouble is that this does not fit the context at all. The sequence is about bringing the guy back by magic, but to keep him from leaving again, more magic is needed.

You can find it here: Дневной дозор (fb2) | Либрусек

It's in the prologue.

"Приворот муженька в доме вернет. Вернуть – вернет, но удержать не удержит."

Yes, you translated it right. What exactly is wrong with the context?

PS Wow! German guy supports book piracy! Beware, learning Russian can make you a criminal!

If you say "you", do you mean me or MasterAdmin? And I only referenced this version for simplicity, though I do read it at work, but I have a real, honest-to-goodness copy of the book at home which I bought with real money. I could even be photographed with it. Just not at my workplace.

But I do agree that безплатно is an exceedingly useful search term. Actually I respect copyright very much, but in some cases our regular copyright is insane. For example, while I may be able to see the newest video content issued by a band or a label in their own channels on Youtube, clicking on an old video in the same channel more often than not yields a message like "this content belongs to Sony / BMG ... and is not available in your country". I mean, if neither band nor label may make their advertising material public, where's the sense in this? It's not as if videos were something you'd go and buy in a shop.

Originally Posted by bitpicker

If you say "you", do you mean me or MasterAdmin?

I mean your treatment of that phrase: "The sequence is about bringing the guy back by magic, but to keep him from leaving again, more magic is needed." It is OK. Why do you say that "this does not fit the context at all"?

And I only referenced this version for simplicity, though I do read it at work, but I have a real, honest-to-goodness copy of the book at home which I bought with real money. I could even be photographed with it. Just not at my workplace.

Opps! Looks like you still have much to learn in Russian...

But I do agree that беcплатно is an exceedingly useful search term. Actually I respect copyright very much, but in some cases
our regular copyright is insane. For example, while I may be able to see the newest video content issued by a band or a label in their own channels on Youtube, clicking on an old video in the same channel more often than not yields a message like "this content belongs to Sony / BMG ... and is not available in your country". I mean, if neither band nor label may make their advertising material public, where's the sense in this? It's not as if videos were something you'd go and buy in a shop.

... but you already have a good start.