And no, I didn't leave anything off my list. I have zero issues about fighting terrorism, the drones, or the NSA. But I will use anything I can find to win a debate. And when I remind people that America did a military coup in Hawaii and tried to kill all the Indians in America in the 18th century and bombed Serbia to grab Kosovo, I'm only proving that Russia annexing Crimea was legit. That's how I win debates!
That’s really cool. Now I seem to know where are you coming from, and we can come back to our “axis of evil” issues, if you don’t mind.
You wrote:
Who is this "Axis of Evil"? What country is posing a serious threat to the security of any other country today? Please name the country and explain how it's imminent that they will invade and take out another country. "Axis of Evil" is a term used to describe a country that's a real and serious threat to another country...

The nukes in Iran are being resolved and that only leaves North Korea. But it's getting friendly with Russia now so they probably aren't a serious threat.
I tend to agree with your to some extent about Iran but not about North Korea. Osama bin Laden used to be friendly with the USA during the war with the Soviet Uninon and than turned his back to the former ally. Hence, friendliness is just a temporary characteristic of a person rather than something permanent and can evaporate anytime.

We know also that North Korea possesses some rudimentary nukes and it is actively trying to develop means of its delivery. Thus,
On April 5, 2009, North Korea launched the Unha-2 space booster (allegedly based on the long-range Taepodong-2). Although the launch was more successful than the 2006 test, the third stage still failed to separate properly. The UN Security Council condemned the launch as a violation of previous Security Council resolutions.[75]

This means North Korea may be able to develop/deploy mobile ICBMs, which can survive a U.S. first strike, within 7–10 years.[76]
North Korea and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hence, I’m asking myself, why do they need these nukes and means of its delivery in the first place. They’re certainly doomed to be defeated in any open armed conflict with the USA right of the bat, with all their stockpile being destroyed within first few hours of the war. The only reason that comes to my mind is that they want to be ready to perpetrate a terrorist attack in the same way as it was done by mad Arabs on 9-11, i.e. without any particular reason just because of their perverted nature, for example, in order to annihilate the main “class enemy” and die as “heroes” afterwards. So, I’m wondering maybe it’s better for the USA to press even harder on these commies and destroy their capacity to harm the USA long before they will be able to commit any heinous act of crime. Thoughts.