Quote Originally Posted by saibot

EDIT: Dobry, I didn't say evolution was proven false. I said all the "proofs" (aka arguments, that people like to say are proofs) FOR evolution have been proven false.

Everything that supports the theory has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, to be false. Not the entire theory itself. But when you take away all the support for a theory, what do you have left?

You can make the call.
saibot,

I understand what you are saying...but logically, you cannot prove a negative, or positive, by the mere absence of something. "Proof" doesn't work that way. Just because a "missing link" has not appeared, does not prove that a "missing link" doesn't exist. I think DDT must agree with me on this.

And...not putting too fine a point on this, butttttt...a standard of "reasonable doubt" has only one, very narrow application...in American criminal trials.

"Reasonable doubt" has no application, no relevance or meaning, in proving or disproving a scientific theory.