Search:

Type: Posts; User: почемучка; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.04 seconds.

  1. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    I think we need to agree to disagree on the Nazism issue. Really, I agree with a lot of your underlying points, I just think that particular cultural factors in the US prevent a hypothetical "war is...
  2. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    Actually, I remember distinctly, lots of reports that proved to be true, that no WMD were being found, from before the invasion. The weapons inspections teams of Hans Blix found nothing. And US...
  3. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    Well, it's an issue in this little debate because you made an explicit claim that it would be possible to convince the American public to be pro-Nazi. That is specifically what I was arguing...
  4. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    And who told you about this? What would have happened if the Nazis had won? Yes, 60 years after their victory you, American, what would you tell us about it? Every Nazi crime would have been...
  5. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    (Please buy the Fox News channel, Ramil!! :D It seems like a terrible channel and anything you did with it would be vast improvement. You could be the political commentator....)
    :yahoo:

    ...
  6. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    Hmmm... In Stalin's USSR situation was the same: you were free to say what you'd like, but you had to accept the consequences.

    But after Stalin the mechanism of providing consequences became not...
  7. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    No, strong anti-Nazi sentiments don't exist because of propaganda. They exist because of the fact that the Nazis rounded up and executed millions of Jews, gypsies, communists, homosexuals, and other...
  8. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    Ok. Imagine I've money and I bought Fox-News channel. I'm a Neo-Nazi and I tell them to start propagandizing Nazi stuff.
    Will I get away with it? (I don't care if I'm marginalized).[/quote]

    Most...
  9. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    I completely understand why they have been enacted in various European countries, but I don't support such statutes. I think they accomplish very little.



    I think that people should be allowed...
  10. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    I think that those SS veterans should have the right to march. It's basic free speech. Fortunately, society also has free rein to heap scorn on them if they so desire. They can mercilessly...
  11. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    Well, that's obviously what the court ruled, but I wanted to know the specific reason why they were in court to begin with. Which law did they break? I'm not an expert on Lithuanian law!
    ...
  12. Re: Lithuanian court defines swastika as “historic legacy”

    Is it illegal to display Nazi symbols in Lithuania? I tried to find information on the specific law there, but I came up with nothing.
Results 1 to 12 of 12


Russian Lessons                           

Russian Tests and Quizzes            

Russian Vocabulary