Search:

That's what I meant. But I used would to make it a suppositional statement based on how some of their Rs, in transliteration, sound like Ls.

I would say a Japanese accent since the r sounds like an l.[/quote]

I suggest you read it a couple of times.

Incidentally, welcome to my ignore list.[/quote]
You seem to have some problem to...

Make up your mind. In your own words you just agreed to what I had said in my first post.
And I agree with you they pronounce the r in difference ways.


Actually he didn't because it was about...

This kind of thing happens sometimes, don't worry. :wink:

There was no sarcasm. I simply pointed out something.


No, I'm not. What kind of stupid question is that [what's in bold].
Do I need to go through a bunch of explanation or can you do your own...

Hence "vice versa".[/quote]Did you read what I wrote? You can't say "no + it's vice versa" since "no" here implies that I'm wrong and "vice versa" implies that I'm right.

Here's the definition...

What's in bold makes no sense, unless you don't know the meaning of vice versa. Was it humor? :)
And it's about how to pronounce a r and not a l. :wink:

Probably and I would say whether it is an uvular r or not will depend on the word and on the person.

I would say a Japanese accent since the r sounds like an l.

You probably meant ch instead of r, which sounds like x in Russian or j in Spanish.