Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Esperanto Sanskrit

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Завсегдатай Crocodile's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    село Торонтовка Онтарийской губернии
    Posts
    3,057
    Rep Power
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by diogen_ View Post
    Crocodile’s logic rule N3. Ignore other's common sense when it contradicts my statistics, and ignore other's statistics when it contradicts my common sense.
    You're getting closer with each rule you deduce from my posts.
    Crocodile's logic rule number three: a common sense can only be useful if enough data (and its respective analysis) was properly collected and processed. Unfortunately, that is never the reality. Sometimes, in my posts I thrive to offer complimentary data and/or analysis. Seldom does it get accepted.

    For example, you mentioned a source (Wikipedia for that matter) which stated the statistics of some 14K speakers of Sanskrit. I pointed out that the same source ALSO mentions there were more users just 10 years earlier, (and obviously 2,000 or so years ago there were many more) so the usage of Sanskrit is clearly on decline. Have you made you point that Sanskirt is not purely something of the past? Yes, and I think I have not disputed that. You convinced me Sanskrit is not purely historic. But does it have a future as a largely spoken language? I think, most unlikely. I missed the point at which you got offended.

  2. #2
    Почтенный гражданин diogen_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    638
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by Crocodile View Post
    For example, you mentioned a source (Wikipedia for that matter) which stated the statistics of some 14K speakers of Sanskrit. I pointed out that the same source ALSO mentions there were more users just 10 years earlier, (and obviously 2,000 or so years ago there were many more) so the usage of Sanskrit is clearly on decline. Have you made you point that Sanskirt is not purely something of the past? Yes, and I think I have not disputed that. You convinced me Sanskrit is not purely historic. But does it have a future as a largely spoken language? I think, most unlikely. I missed the point at which you got offended.
    Sorry, I only wanted to prove with Wiki that Sanskrit is not completely dead. Nothing else. And I actually needn't the time machine or reincarnate in the past to find its speakers as you claimed. That's all. Also, no one knows the future for sure. Hebrew was the dead language for centuries, and now it flourishes with five million speakers*. It's better to stay away from predictions about languages. Likewise, I'm not offended at all. Normal discussion without insults; you challenge my points and visa versa.

    *Hebrew language - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Similar Threads

  1. Artificial languages (not Esperanto ;)
    By wviz in forum Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: September 4th, 2007, 07:44 AM
  2. Esperanto
    By Darobat in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: May 12th, 2005, 07:14 AM
  3. Esperanto?
    By Antono in forum Tech Support and Site Comments
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: December 17th, 2004, 01:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Russian Lessons                           

Russian Tests and Quizzes            

Russian Vocabulary