Quote Originally Posted by Ramil
it-ogo - that is a simplified version, a figure of speech if you want. I defined the criteria in my posts above if you had only bothered to read.
Yep, you rely on the state punitive machine (jury is a part of that machine anyway). A strange thing for an anarchist.

Machine is used to avoid personal responsibility for the killing. OK, let's assume that sometimes it is necessary. What for? For someone to enjoy sweet revenge? I believe it is unacceptable.

To make the society safe. This is OK. Will the life imprisonment be less safe for the society than killing? Only if the state punitive machine fails to afford the life imprisonment. That is if the machine is ineffective in general. If the machine is ineffective in general how it can be effective in selecting whom to kill?