Quote Originally Posted by Throbert McGee View Post
So while Gilyarovsky deserves to be called a hero for his successful effort to ban lobotomies, I wonder: is it possible that он поступил правильно, а на неправильном основе? (I mean, "Did he do the right thing for the wrong reasons?") Was his objection more ideological than scientific, yet history proved that he was scientifically correct?
I believe that "Narrow Localizationism" is a scientific objection rather than political. Although it looks like some sort of political ideology, in fact it means the theory of narrow localization of the brain functions inside brain.