The only difference is that the young families actually LIVE IN THE APARTMENTS for those 20-30 years, and the cooperative apartments took 10 or more years TO BUILD after the money was paid.
I think I gave a good example - a person who produced more goods than the norm allows and sold it privately. That was penalized by the confiscation. For example: the peasants were supposed to work in the public fields using the means of production (the machinery, the seeds, etc.) provided by the collective household using the directions provided by the collective household. At the same time, those peasants were able to maintain the tiny pieces of land in their private use - they could use private means of cultivating the land and use the crop produced by that land to feed themselves and to sell the extra on the market. If they were found of cultivating more than the norm - they were penalized by confiscation.
Would you be able to cite a precedence? Maybe I misunderstood what you said.
Well, that's not entirely true. The nomenclature had it all by confiscating property from other people.
That's very sad. Like I said, if the personal belongings had been registered under the name of the thief's relative, they weren't confiscated as well by the Soviet State leading to the similar situation on the smaller scale.
I think that addresses a different concern. The Soviet Laws prohibited even the small enterprises. Had any of the enterprises been legally allowed, some of them would pay taxes and some of them would evade it.