I don't see why that matters. You were talking to a Brit who is "enamoured of the Land of the Free etc.." Since no one in this thread, including Eric, has said anything that even suggests they are "enamoured of the Land of the Free etc.." your point falls flat regardless of anyone's nationality.Since very few people in participating in this thread have bothered to fill in their location you have no way of knowing anyone's nationality. For all we know, our "top secret nationality" friend Eric might be a grammatically challenged Brit,
No, we got that, which is why I laughed when I saw you complaining about "... personal attacks or false accusations towards the person with conflicting opinions. Class."although that is not who I had in mind when I made my comment.
Class, indeed.
Your problem, Hanna, is that you've taken a perfectly healthy scepticism and distrust of US foreign policy and reduced it down to some sort of simplistic binary world view where the US is bad by definition and therefore anyone opposed to (or by) the US must by definition be good; where any statement that doesn't contradict the US' official line must be a lie and any that does must be true; where everything bad that happens anywhere to anyone must ultimately be the fault of the US; where there are no other factors or self-interested actors influencing or attempting to influence events to any degree; and where anyone who suggests that you may perhaps be ignoring some potential nuance or shades of grey (to say the least), must logically be some sort of US stooge.
A world view that is, frankly, as fantastically infantile as it is spirit-crushingly banal.