Quote Originally Posted by Eric C. View Post
Of course, just the way his Soviet predecessors did in the Eastern Europe area. The problem was, the money went to their lobbyists rather than actual people there.
Do you believe western money did go to “actual people” and has not been wasted on senseless military buildup and bloody "anti-terrorist operation" since the coup? Also, in what way standard state “usury” is better than “geopolitical lobbyism” for these "actual people"?

This time it's a bit more complicated, but as soon as every eastern Ukrainian realizes the language they speak is only secondary (at best) when it comes to their national identity, another geopolitical trick will result in another big piece of losses.
Sorry. Your language is really too vague to comprehend. What is “primary” to their identity, what “ geopolitical trick” do you mean, what “losses” they will have to endure, and how it all may occur. Could you please elaborate your possible scenario in more detail. I don’t believe I follow your ideas as you originally produced them without adulterations of my personal “confabulations”.

"Deflecting the attention of the population" tricks are going to be extremely useful for a certain else "wise" government, whose geopolitical games have caused the country's entire economy to be running down at the speed of light. I'm really curious what they come up with.
Once again, please share your thoughts on what "they” may come up with “us”. One or two ideas on what is going to happen and when it all may come around. I'm just curious what to expect.