Printable View
"Россию ждут мощные землетрясения" http://news.rambler.ru/Russia/r/5558641/14696291/
I'm well aware of the fact that ждать is usually used w/ genetive - looks like there's some kinda different situations asking for the accusative, obviously -
???
Thanks for your input/explanations on my somewhat weird grammar *blackout*
I don't see anything unusual in that sentence. When it's "There is something before someone in the future", it's always the accusative.Quote:
Originally Posted by krobatshov
Меня ждут дела.
Ничего хорошего его не ждёт.
Его соседку ждёт тюрьма.
Америку ждут перемены.
These all are accusative.
The statement that ждать takes the genitive is outdated. Most of the time it takes accusative.
Really? All of my textbooks say that "ждать" takes the accusative case when waiting for an animate object, and the genitive case when waiting for something inanimate.
ie,
Я жду вашего ответа. (genitive)
Я жду своего брата. (accusative)
Don't mix up here ;-)
Я жду брата - Nominative + verb + genitive
Меня ждут дела - Accusative + verb + nominative
It's like an inverted, or passive form. Like: I have something to do; and something needs to be done.
Actually, it's the accusative here. If you replace the brother by a sister you will instantly figure it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene-p
Ты вряд ли сказал бы «Я жду сестры», так что это скорее внимательный падеж. Нет?Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene-p
Угу. А вот когда "я не жду сестры" - это обратно родительный.Quote:
Originally Posted by Zubr
That's correct. But not a complete statement, I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlow
I would say when talking about a country as a whole it behaves as animate in this case:
Я жду сестру. - Acc.
Все страны, кроме Америки, уже проголосовали. Все ждут Америку. - Acc.
Мы ждём Россию. - Acc.
And again, it was also correct that accusative is always required when "ждать" is used in sense of some future predictions: Землю ждут несчастья. Новые проблемы ждут нашу планету. Москву ждёт жара. etc.
So, there are just more specific rules.
I am also not sure what would be a correct form in case of
Я жду весну. VS Я жду весны. For me, the both versions sound good enough, the second one seems to be a bit bookish. Other opinions?
It's accusative. Try to say "Я жду папы". Should be "папу"; it's accusative.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene-p
Oops :fool"Quote:
It's accusative. Try to say "Я жду папы". Should be "папу"; it's accusative.
Alright, so think first how you'd say that in English.Quote:
Originally Posted by krobatshov
1. I'm waiting for my brother. <=> My brother is waiting for me.
vs.
2. [s:pdnlicdw]Russia is waiting for the mighty earthquakes.[/s:pdnlicdw] => Mighty earthquakes await Russia.
So, I believe it's the word order that had confused you. Basically:
Россию ждут мощные землетрясения. = Мощные землетрясения ожидают/ждут Россию.
As a result, it's the word "Россия" that gets declined and not "землетрясения".
И всё же это ждательный падеж. Прочитайте ссылку, данную vox05; там всё подробно описано и про «жду письма» и про «жду папу»:
http://www.lyubertsy.ru/page-al-hitrye_ ... azyka.html
Ну, как-то пока обходились без него. Не будем множить сущностей. :unknown:Quote:
Originally Posted by SAn
Иногда лучше умножить, чем произвольно распихивать в разные категории, потому что нужной не оказалось. Местный падеж тоже не будем множить? В лЕсе, так сказать, родилась елочка и в лесе росла... Или даже так - "в лесу", это, очевидно, дательный, с ударением на первый слог, ну а то что в множественном числе получится "в лесам родились елочки" - это глюк, не обращать внимания.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crocodile
Although both of these sentences are grammatically correct, as a matter of style , I think the first sentence is slightly better, because to me it sounds strange to "personify" earthquakes, as in the second sentence. Earthquakes have no concrete existence -- you can personify the earth itself, but if the earth is seen as a person, then earthquakes ought to be seen as behavior of the earth, like a child's tantrum. One can say, for example, "Mt. Fuji is waiting to explode", but "A volcanic eruption awaits Japan" falls badly on the ear.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crocodile
To express the idea in the first sentence, either of these two seem most natural to me
Russia can expect major earthquakes (within the next 500 years, as a geological likelihood).
Russia is expecting major earthquakes (possibly within days or weeks).
Using "can" in the first sentence emphasizes that the danger is not necessarily in the near future, although it is inevitable in the long term. Cf. "We can expect that the Yellowstone supervolcano will erupt within the next 10,000 years." The progressive present tense in the second example emphasizes that seismologists have already detected warning signs of an approaching earthquake, and disaster-preparation must begin immediately.
If you want to make earthquakes the subject of the sentence, I would suggest, instead of "earthquakes await Russia":
Major earthquakes are in store for Russia.
Major earthquakes lie ahead for Russia.
P.S. By the way, "major" or "massive" or "severe" are the adjectives most often used to describe strong earthquakes. "Mighty", in general, is a rather poetic word that often seems out of place and even a bit манерно in colloquial speech (except when used as a slang intensifier with the meaning "very" -- as in "Wow, this is mighty good pizza!", or "Damn, she's got mighty fine legs!"). And to call an earthquake "mighty" creates the vague impression that you are blaming the disaster on an angry pagan god. Thus, "a mighty earthquake" would be the perfect phrase to use if you were writing dialogue for a movie about superstitious villagers in pre-modern times, but it sounds odd otherwise.
Russia lies ahead in store for major earthquakes.
Thanks all - Looks like I've forgotten about the animate vs. inanimate thing about this word in particular - Unlike other words I used to be concerned with- words dealing with one case -- this one got two versions of it
Considering a whole nation being animate sounds reasonable to me - therefore, the use of accusative cases does make sense
Nevertheless, it seems that some cases still seem to be worth discussing about it - as the amount of replies on my thread proof ^^
Thanks again for all the input, links and explanations - :good:
It's not that much about animate vs. inanimate things here; it's exactly the case when it's about some "close events in the future". Here's a couple of examples with inanimate things, in the same construction:Quote:
Originally Posted by krobatshov
Этот театр ждут большие перемены. (accusative)
Эту комнату ждёт большая уборка. (accusative)
Right, the thing is that I used to associate a single case system with this word all the time. I'm glad to have finally fixed the uncertainties with this particular word - at least I got a glimpse of HOW and WHEN to do what in terms of proper grammar use.
The fact that close future interactions and/or inanimate vs. animate relations shape the grammatical outcome was some kinda update to me.