Originally Posted by
fortheether ...Tell me about it. Do not dress it up. I can take it.
I am sorry, Scott, maybe it's my bad English, but you last words sound to me like there is a grain of sarcasm in them. Sorry, if I was too cruel to "western viewers", and of course, I didn't live in the 40's and I, personally, can't tell you or anyone else about that time. But, you know... it's not something political about the western and Russian ideas of WWII movies. It's just another human point of view. In Russian cinema, it's always a story about people, about a human nature, a war
drama. In American/Western cinema, it's always an
action movie, an
adventure, where facts and events are more important than people. I don't like it, and I find it wrong.
Originally Posted by
rockzmom Of the few "war" movies I have watched, to me they are "dramas" set in a "war time" not a film about a "war" or a film which 90% of it is with soldiers and takes place on a battle field.
SO, using the example of "The Cranes are Flying" I would never consider this a "war" film
I have already said that before, in other thread, and have said that just in this very post above, and I don't know why, but I'd like to repeat it again.
Russian WWII films are dramas, not action movies, so let's call them "war dramas" henceforth and unto ages of ages.