Are there physicists out there in this forum who can explain in simple terms to a simple-minded crocodile the possible consequences of the following: (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 172648.htm)

Quote Originally Posted by http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100406172648.htm
Because Einstein's general theory of relativity does not choose a time orientation, if a black hole can form from the gravitational collapse of matter through an event horizon in the future then the reverse process is also possible. Such a process would describe an exploding white hole: matter emerging from an event horizon in the past, like the expanding universe.
So, if the paper suggests the matter collapses through the black hole in another universe and emerges in our universe through the white hole, does that mean the 'parent' universe should have significantly more matter than the 'child' universe? The last time I checked the amount of matter in our universe appeared to be final. But the amount of matter collapsing into a black hole is not final, isn't it? I mean, the black hole is a super-massive structure and thus would constantly pull in more matter, correct? Therefore, if our universe is a 'child' universe, we should have seen more matter appearing in our universe all the time, but that's not what we see, right?