My point is, was and will be this:
The ethymological background must be understood not only analyzing the roots of the words but the people who spoke those languages in specific regions in time, they can't be analyzed only in the basis of the language. I have said and repeat Basque is spoken in Spain and also in Caucasian mountians. If the very linguists themselves are wondering about the theories of the people who spoke those languages are not gonna be a bunch of amateurs who are gonna deny or accept just because they think. Now, it seems some of you have been enjoying so much to chat with me that keep on opening new subthemes of things I said rather than adding to the main thread. So typical!
Lemme ask you, what do you know about the "kelts"?