Thread: Современные русские фильмы - обзоры

So you want to say Ivan was not cruel, and Philip II was not mitropolitan and was not killed by Malyuta because he was in confrontation with Ivan's politics? You are talking about insignificant details, which can not be proved or unproved and.

Originally Posted by pushvv

So you want to say Ivan was not cruel, and Philip II was not mitropolitan and was not killed by Malyuta because he was in confrontation with Ivan's politics? You are talking about insignificant details, which can not be proved or unproved and.

So you want to say that several key facts is the only thing that matters and you can wrap them in whatever your left foot likes? It's not about significance of details which can or cannot be proven. It is about the responsibility with which our shared historical legacy should be treated.
Anyway, tastes differ, and I see no reason against respecting your opinion to certain extent. So I'd like to conclude my argumentation with this:
Nostalgia Critic: Pearl Harbor
This video illustrates the feelings I've gone through while watching "Tsar" on the example of this American movie critic's reaction to a movie made with much better but still not responsible enough attitude towards the historical events described. Although I'd recommend to watch the whole video, the part I wanted to mention starts approximately at 24:30 (or even 23:15).