Since we're talking about this case again, I'd like to ask 'Western people' about something. Here's a youtube clip called 'The last Litvinenko's interview' http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcaszcXgoM4
Seriously, guys, does he REALLY sound any convincing in this clip, to you?

I haven't heard any reasonable or convincing word in his speech; there is nothing but "someone told someone that xxxx, and this second someone told me, and I can be a witness of it in any court, and feel free to quote me".
Also, he mentions a famous Listyev's case (a very popular journalist Vlad Listyev was murdered in 1995, and the crime remained unsolved). He says that he had all the evidences about this case, and that he knows who are the murders. And still, he does NOT say who they are. He only says, "I know all, and I can be a wintess in a court". At once, he is brave enough to say that Putin murdered someone (a figure like Listyev). So the version that he fears to name Listyev's murders fails.
Also, his statement that no one would touch a famous journalist in Russia without Putin's personal direction is just stupid; and at the same time it's presented as an "evidence" that it was Putin and nobody else.

How can people in the West swallow rubbish like that??