Johanna and rockzmom thanks for your
[s:2cya8twl]s[/s:2cya8twl] fast and comprehensive replies. First of all I
will try to explain with my creepy
English why I chose
[s:2cya8twl]just[/s:2cya8twl] the "General Discussion" topic and not the other one. I
[s:2cya8twl]had looked[/s:2cya8twl] have been looking over the "General Discussion" topic
for nearly
[s:2cya8twl]for[/s:2cya8twl] the last 2 months. But I
[s:2cya8twl]cannot[/s:2cya8twl] could not join
[s:2cya8twl]ed to[/s:2cya8twl] it as I
[s:2cya8twl]do[/s:2cya8twl] did not received
a confirmation
email. Over all this time I had noticed that you and some others (Оля, Zaya, Basil77, Lt. Columbo. sorry if I missed
[s:2cya8twl]somebody[/s:2cya8twl] anyone else) are most active in posting messages. And
[s:2cya8twl]I'm just had[/s:2cya8twl] I've just gotten (become) accustomed to all of you. The second reason
[s:2cya8twl]why[/s:2cya8twl] I created
this thread
[s:2cya8twl]in[/s:2cya8twl] under th
[s:2cya8twl]e[/s:2cya8twl]is current topic
[s:2cya8twl]is[/s:2cya8twl] may be my erroneous conclusion that in the other places such a subject may rest without the attention of
anyone fluent in
English
[s:2cya8twl]peoples[/s:2cya8twl]. That is why I decided to post
under [s:2cya8twl]current thread in[/s:2cya8twl] the "General Discussion" topic.
As to the article from "The New York Times" I learned (or learnt
) that I should not ask such sort of question because there is enough other ones (more general) I have to find the answers in the first place. But if rockzmom won't be
[s:2cya8twl]opposite[/s:2cya8twl] opposed I will keep posting other questions on this issue in th
[s:2cya8twl]e[/s:2cya8twl]is current thread.