Printable View
I'm currently using 'it' when referring to USA but I use 'они' (they) in Russian when doing the same. After all, I think it's more correct to use 'they' since they are United States.
I've got confused about that only recently.
So when I say USA do I use 'it' (since I am referring to a single country) or they (because there are many states in USA)?
Also, do I say "USA does smth." or "USA do smth."?
Use USA in the singular... not plural... don't use они, unless you're talking about the 'people', or referring specifically to a group of States.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramil
In the U.S. we use U.S.A. as singular in sentences. It's not technically correct grammar... but it is traditional and normal.
U.S.A. (or U.S.) = 'It'... The U.S.A. (usually referring to the Federal government, i.e. Bush and the Congress... 'One Nation')
The citizens of the U.S.A. = 'they'
A group of States = 'they'
@Dobry
Are there actually any differences regarding that between U.S. english and G.B. english?
As far as I remember, when talking about f.e. music bands or companies, one country's language uses singular while the other uses plural. E.g.:
"Microsoft said that they would sell all of their.." vs. "Microsoft said that it would sell all of its..".
Don't know who uses what, though.
The U.S. is one identity. It is a unification of states. "The US will not back down from its Iraq policy" e.g.
"The US declared war on its arch-enemy: North Korea"
I recall someone in another topic said that in Britain they use "they"+"USA". Is that right?
You could say: "In the U.S., they eat hamburgers", but you refer to the people not the country...
There is more than one state, but it is one country, so I'd use "it", i.e. "The US said it will...blahblahblah" not "The US said they will...blahblah"
By the way, you spelled referring wrong :)
who did? :?Quote:
Originally Posted by RusskiSlav
It's now politically incorrect, but you'll also see "she/her" used as well (just like ships). EG:
"The United States must protect her borders. She will do all that she can to defeat the terrorists."
"She" will only become politically incorrect if people stop using it. That's why I make a point to use it! Besides, it sounds nice.
(Offtopic)Quote:
Originally Posted by RusskiSlav
Why did you write "The US said they will"? I was taught that it must be "The US said they would"
Is it just a typo ?
You can use both depending on the context.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuvak
The USA said it will destroy Iraq. - It is certain, they ARE going to.
The USA said it would destroy Iraq. - They might, could... they would destroy it if... or it could be referring to the past ie "the USA said it would destroy Iraq but they decided not to"
By the way, I think "the USA said they would" is not incorrect. I hear that quite a bit... It's the same when referring to companies etc "Telecom said they would...."
Me in the topic nameQuote:
Originally Posted by kalinka_vinnie
just cause someone says "The United States said they would..." doesn't mean it's right. everyone makes this mistake all the time, and not just in English. but proper grammar calls for "The United States said it would..."
Sshhh... don't say that to charlestonian, he'll give you google hit results and claim that if google says it, it must be correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by awb
sure, it's quite fine colloquially. and that's what google is, a compilation of websites written by random people..
BUT IT IS TRUE! GOOGLE is ALWAYS right. Like, "Every two child did." That IS a sentence, grammar nazis! Google says so! 500+ people say so! :P :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by kalinka_vinnie
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=& ... tnG=Search
Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo.
I don't see any errors in "referring"....Quote:
Originally Posted by RusskiSlav
Quote:
Originally Posted by kalinka_vinnie
You are in a good mood I see... Do you want me to spoil it for you? :lol: