Can anyone explain the difference between these two forms of farm under communism?
Many thanks.
Printable View
Can anyone explain the difference between these two forms of farm under communism?
Many thanks.
From Robert Service's History Of Twentieth Century Russia:
'[Stalin's] ideal organisation was the sovkhoz. This was a collective farm run on the same principles as a state-owned factory. Local authorities marked out the land for each sovkhoz and hired peasants for fixed wages. Such a type of farming was thought eminently suitable for the grain-growing expanses in Ukraine and southern Russia. Yet Stalin recognized that most peasants were ill-disposed to becoming wage-labourers, and he yielded to the extent of permitting most farms to be of the kolkhoz type. In a kolkhoz, the members were rewarded by results. If the quotas were not met, the farm was not paid. Furthermore, each peasant was paid a fraction of the farm wage-fund strictly in accordance with the number of 'labour days' he or she had contributed to the farming year.
And so the kolkhoz was defined as occupying a lower level of socialist attainment than the sovkhoz. In the long run the official expectation was that all kolkhozes would be turned into sovkhozes in Soviet agriculture; but still the kolkhoz, despite its traces of private self-interest, was treated as a socialist organisational form.'
As I suspect, the difference was more formal than real. But (at least, in theory), Sovkhoz ("Soviet farm") was totally state-owned enterprise; Kolkhoz ("Collective farm") was owned by its workers, although under State control.
I thought Совхоз = совместное хозяйство. :?Quote:
Originally Posted by Scorpio