Quote Originally Posted by it-ogo View Post
I did not read Гурджиев's works but I have some second-hand information and ideas about him. He is a philosopher who classify his ideas as "esoteric". It means that these ideas and "knowledge" don't have any value without some secret procedures. It is a kind of game or art: if you like this kind of stuff, you can enjoy it. Otherwise it has no use.
Yeah, that's close to my takeaway as well. Blavatsky has proven more interesting, though.. With her, I can understand where people of the time thought she was a nut.. Some of the things she talks about would make people in 1900 awful mad =)