LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksAfter reading an article this morning in the BBC about this practice I was very intrigued and immediately realized that if it worked I could use it for studying and memorization in foreign language. So I created a few experiments comparing rote memorization versus locuses already in my long-term memory and discovered the following:
Prior to trying this with actual words I did a few tests with numbers. The conclusion of these tests was that I was able to juggle 3 lists of 20 random numbers between 1 and 999 without error in their original order. That is not to say I was limited to repeating them only in order. If I did not want to include a number I simply "walked around" an item so to speak.BTW if you do not know what the hell I am talking about then I will explain in the paragraph after next.
First I took five verbs and five nouns and listed their conjugations (or declensions) and proper stresses. I then performed the Rote Test. It took me about 5m14s to feel comfortable enough to test my memory. I made 2 to 3 errors per word when I attempted to copy the list from memory. I should note that for all of these tests I purposely did not use the knowledge of conjugating and declining that I already knew. I just wrote down whether or not I honestly remembered what I had read from the list without thinking of the grammatical rules for the gender and stem endings and so on.
Second I took another five verbs and five nouns as before. This time I used the Method of Loci, attributing each word to a place I was very familiar with and its conjugation/declension to an item or thing in this place. I started small, by only trying it with one word. After 1m2s I felt comfortable with the word and tried to write it down (including stresses). I succeeded with no errors and I barely had to think about it at all. I just imagined walking through this area (one of the first apartments I lived in) and immediately recalled all of the conjugations. I was curious if I could manage two lists, and tried a noun. This time, already understanding how the process works, I was comfortable with my memory map after only 34s. I tried to write down both lists and it took only 2 or 3 seconds to make each. I proceeded to memorize the rest, and although it took me considerably longer to feel comfortable with the list (compare 10m28s to 5m14s for rote memorization), I was able to easily recall all of the tables.
Third, I went and had my twentieth cup of coffee for the day and came back when the timer on my watch was around 4m58s (eh close enough). I tested myself again and still was able to write down the full listings for all 10 words without any pausing or mistakes. I could not, however, remember more than one or two of even the infinitive/nominative forms of the words I chose for the first experiment. Of course, one cannot make any judgments about this as most of this information had been pushed out of my brain by the second experiment.
My conclusion: if you have a vocabulary test or something I highly recommend trying this approach to memorizing the words (it is probably even more efficient for memorizing just the lists of words rather than full tables of conjugations; I am sure with this method I could memorize several dozen within 10-15 minutes). As far as I have so far been able to tell it is an astonishingly efficient replacement for rote learning of boring data.
PS: It has now been 12 hours since I did this test and I still remember all of them!
Reply With Quote
Well, that's weird. It works perfectly for me. I've only been trying it for a day and I can already remember the order of a deck of cards after 30 minutes of studying them. Maybe you just aren't doing it right. The way I made it more efficient was to use objects that were part of the environment itself rather than just furniture and appliances. Assigning the doors, stairways and banisters, carpets and light bulbs et al their own value practically doubled my ability to fit as much data as possible into each room. I just put each word or number (or suit and value for the cards) on the item in big cartoony letters and whisper it to myself. Like on the stairs I'd have "4192" stretching upwards across them. That was a lot easier than just pairing the data to the items in a cold way. Start with the first three, then add the fourth, recite it a couple of times, add the fifth, and so on until you can choose any item at random and call up the data attributed to it. It is like having a big associative array in your brain. 
Originally Posted by mike 
