Thread: Афганистан: как история повторяет себя

Originally Posted by Eric C.

Following your logic, when you get robbed or terrorized by some criminals, why would the police get involved? That's your own business, and you can perfectly deal with that on your own. Right?

That is an irrelevant allegory that does not make sense in the argument. People and countries are two different things.

If I, as a civilian, get robbed or terrorized by criminals, I expect the local police to do their job and help out, whether I am in the USA, EU, Afghanistan or anywhere else. Tax payers pay for this sort of protection, through the police. This however, has nothing to do with the argument.

Afghanistan did NOT ask anyone to come and interfere in their country, and neither the USA, nor NATO, the EU or any other organisation has a mandate to be a "world police" and invade countries.

The reasons that the UN approved the resolution to go in there was:
1) Exaggerated/incorrect information about "Al-Qaeda" (which might not even exist) allegedly operating from Afghanistan. The group of moslem terrorists arround bin Laden was small, and the number of people that support this type of islamic extremism have grown rather than diminished in connection with the war. Furthermore, we now have tons of "refugees" from these areas which are not exactly the sort of citizens that the EU needs.
2) Sympathy for the USA after 11 Sept. Sure it was terrible, but large numbers of people die of violence around the world all the time. The amount of coverage that the event got would indicate that 1 American life is worth 100 times more than 1 life in any other country. Already, over 100,000 Afghan civilians have died in events that would not have taken place, were it not for the invasion
3) Russia and China did not veto the UN sanction, for whatever reason.

Personally I don't like the Talibans at all, but what they do, in their country is not my problem, it's the problem of the Afghans.

Originally Posted by Hanna

3) Russia and China did not veto the UN sanction, for whatever reason.

The reason was obvious, you've named it yourself:

Sympathy for the USA after 11 Sept.

But after Iraq invasion without UN resolution and even without a sanction of NATO council, lies about WMD in Iraq and some other issues (deploying of 3rd position area of US missile defence in particular) attitude has changed.

Originally Posted by Basil77

The reason was obvious, you've named it yourself: Sympathy for the USA.

Yes... But one has to wonder what the Chinese were thinking. Somehow they don't strike me as a government that would shed any tears over some lost lives in the USA - they are even willing to shoot down their own countrymen, and big tragedies happen there on a regular basis. It wouldn't surprise me if they thought something like: 'You want another Vietnam.... be my guest! hehe.... good luck boys - we can lend you some more money if you like...... "

Afghanistan is not in their sphere of influence exactly, and perhaps the ethical issue with invading a country on the other side of the globe did not worry them. (But wait until the UN tries to vote about a country on their border, like North Korea.)

Who knows, maybe Russia was thinking the same thing, although it's really strange in my opinion, that Russia did not at least TRY to stop it! If nothing else, I think that narcotics are coming into Russia from there, and it's destabilising for countries in Central Asia. But then, the whole world was like in a trance at that time. For months, you practically saw nothing on the news other than those planes again and again, and crying Americans. Maybe it got to the Russians too.

The fact that no Europeans vetoed it just shows how brainwashed most are to love America no matter what they do, and never question their actions. At the time, I did not think much about it myself, I was only mildly against it.

Interestingly, Bin Laden himself said that his reasons for the attack was that he hated American military bases in Saudi. As crazy as he was.... Well yes. American bases in other countries are bad. If they didn't have them, Sept 11 might never have happened.

Originally Posted by Hanna

That is an irrelevant allegory that does not make sense in the argument. People and countries are two different things.

If I, as a civilian, get robbed or terrorized by criminals, I expect the local police to do their job and help out, whether I am in the USA, EU, Afghanistan or anywhere else. Tax payers pay for this sort of protection, through the police. This however, has nothing to do with the argument.

Afghanistan did NOT ask anyone to come and interfere in their country, and neither the USA, nor NATO, the EU or any other organisation has a mandate to be a "world police" and invade countries.

The reasons that the UN approved the resolution to go in there was:
1) Exaggerated/incorrect information about "Al-Qaeda" (which might not even exist) allegedly operating from Afghanistan. The group of moslem terrorists arround bin Laden was small, and the number of people that support this type of islamic extremism have grown rather than diminished in connection with the war. Furthermore, we now have tons of "refugees" from these areas which are not exactly the sort of citizens that the EU needs.
2) Sympathy for the USA after 11 Sept. Sure it was terrible, but large numbers of people die of violence around the world all the time. The amount of coverage that the event got would indicate that 1 American life is worth 100 times more than 1 life in any other country. Already, over 100,000 Afghan civilians have died in events that would not have taken place, were it not for the invasion
3) Russia and China did not veto the UN sanction, for whatever reason.

Personally I don't like the Talibans at all, but what they do, in their country is not my problem, it's the problem of the Afghans.

Imagine yourself living in such a country and suffering from what those in power do to the people. You cry out for help, but you're told it's your problem and your business, and just suggested do whatever you can do. But you can't! What would you do then?

See, sometimes some kind of "world police" is really needed. Sometimes people can't deal with such problems on their own...