Quote Originally Posted by it-ogo View Post
There is always some risk for any person to get in trouble. And there are indirect ways to find such potentially troublesome situation, provoke it and control the process. That is what secret services must be able to do. Of course nobody came to a girl and say "I am Bond. James Bond. I'll pay you $1e6 if you will accuse that guy". But for example, she could occasionally find or hear something that makes her mad about that guy. Or find a clue how to became a celebrity (if that is what she dreamed of) etc. etc. Conspiracies are delicate matter.

The result is he got a strong psychological pressure for ridiculous reasons. He became ridiculous himself because of it. Of course CIA did not want him to be killed or imprisoned for a long term or he will become a martyr and hero for the public. And this is a warning for all those narcissic would-be heroes: if you will make us troubles, then you will get exhausting ridiculous problems. Good work, CIA!
Hmmmm...... Wow - your conclusion is hard to argue with.

Reading about these girls - they just make me cringe!
They are slutty, stupid and have essentially brought shame on their country. The whole affairs is embarassing for Sweden whichever way you look at it, or regardless your opinion on Assange and Wikileaks.

Apparently she was 'disappointed' that Assange wasn't serious about their 'relationship'. Hence the accusation. What woman of 28 doesn't know that in order for a man to take you seriously, you don't just jump in bed with him the first time you meet him?! It's unbelievable that she could believe that he was "serious" about her after a one-night-stand! But that's what she has apparently been saying. What she really accomplished is ruined her reputation for the rest of her LIFE. I can't imagine why she'd voluntarily do that, unless there is a big fat bank account waiting for her somewhere far, far away from the EU.....

Secondly I looked this up, and the 'socialism' that her cheezy organisation reckon they support is also laughable. It's not the real deal whatsoever. They just talk a bit in general support of multiculturalism/antiracism, human rights, feminism and 'inclusiveness (i.e of homosexuals). Basically this organisation is nothing more radical than the standard "PC" agenda, but with red banners and a bit of marching on 1 May. Blah! She was initially painted in media as quite a revolutionary - but this was definitely not true.

I really don't know what to make of this but it's a real FAIL for Sweden however you look at it! If the CIA did orchestrate it (which I am not convinced off) they they really have a sixth sense. Creepy, creepy!