yes, as it doesn't any longer represent European aspirations of Ukraine, it was so under the previous administration however incapable it was, but certainly not now. this is nothing but the proverbial Potemkin Village.
how is this possible when at the same time people in towns across Donetsk region receive running water in their houses by schedule and it hardly reaches upper floors?
but if europeans come, those who have eyes will just see for themselves
https://www.facebook.com/NoEuro2012InUkraine
actually no, i'd prefer European officials to remind him of the state of affairs in Ukraine every time he visits EU
i welcome this trend because i don't believe it's motivated by hostility towards Ukrainian people, it's Ukraine's authorities business to make an effort to change the country's image in Europe
positive things are always taken for granted, it's the negative things which draw attention
after all mass media is after scandals, so if Ukraine can provide some scandalous stories, why avoid them? especially when Ukrainians themselves consider them just as scandalous
Tymoshenko was not a president but a prime minister, the president was Yushenko
I don't think she's less corrupt, plus she's a pathological liar, her activity as prime minister was a joke, however their administration declared pro-European policy and their inner policy was a lot more liberal both economically and politically.
There could be some underhanded reasons, but on the face of it, it's an individual who's personal history, background and associates are well known and it doesn't make you want to like him
corruption and corrupt mentality is the keynote of great many things which are going on, you need to live it to start to find out, some became so obvious and mundane that almost everybody stopped noticing them or consider corrupt and abnormal.
maybe some of them you regarded as just exotic and attributed to national specifics
i could concede that it's me who i'm hard on, i need to just start not giving a shit LOL
but it makes life comfortless
they are cynical because they came to terms, i didn't
the politicians' motivation cannot be strong by definition because they subsist on corruption when they come to power
so by being angled do you mean the story is untrue?