does it make it any more acceptable just because of those who you listed?

the presidents you listed are/were the heads of relatively rich, successful countries ruled by the law, therefore their wealth looks more natural and not so much as an eyesore, as you yourself put it 'it is vulgar and unsuitable... in a country that struggles with poverty'

what accusations do you mean? i couldn't understand a word of the commentary, but the speech of the featured Ukrainian journalist didn't sound biased or unfounded to me, i hear, see and read it day in and day out.

the lifestyle of this individual is on par with some of the most louche African chiefs, what's troubling is that it happens not in Africa but in the modern day Europe, even though only geographically