I think most residents of Europe would disagree with you, and I don't know what makes you qualified to determine the political nature of an entire continent, in direct contrast to the views of its inhabitants.
Err... I am the person that started this thread - so it should suggest to you that I have a particular interest in the subject. I study socialism and have read a lot of the original writings of socialists and communists (from hundreds of years ago).

I have also read more recent communist and socialist literature (which basically just restates and expands on what the older literature said).

I regularly watch the updates by Richard Wolff, a/the leading American Marxian economist. Richard Wolff is also very knowledgeable when it comes to socialism and has produced an entire video series on the subject. He consults with businesses that are looking for assistance in developing their communist style businesses.

I have also watched many of the talks by prominent European socialists.

Are you American
No I am not. What has that got to do with anything? I am from New Zealand (which is also a socialist country).

To say "no socialist country is more socialist than another" shows that you don't understand the concept of socialism.
To say that this means I don't understand the concept of socialism, shows that you don't understand the concept of socialism.

Would you consider a feudal society more socialist than Norway? Both are socialist - just different types.

Feudalism had a lot of private ownership (the lords owned the land). That doesn't change the fact that feudalism is a type of socialism (reactionary socialism).

Usually unfounded accusations about "socialism" and "communism" without understanding it, come from teenagers (if European) or Americans.
Except I didn't make unfounded "accusations" about socialism and communism did I? I literally posted earlier on in this topic quotes from the 1847 book "The Principles of Communism" - which set out what socialism is.

Today, there have been more branches of socialism (for example Marxian-Lenism socialism), but that does not mean the old literature is not relevant. The old literature is still what most modern day communist and socialism is based on. New literature still references the old literature. It is still studied by proponents of socialism and communism.

Many of the Europeans I have met are happy to accept that they live in socialist countries. I think it is more likely that an American would not think they live in a socialist country (even though they do).

I also read reports produced by the European Union on socialist/communist practices in Europe (for example Co-determination in Germany).

And yes, before you ask, I do know the difference between communism and socialism. Implementing communist ideals is one form of socialism (democratic socialism) which is why I use a "/" mark between the two. The practices/ideals constitute a part of socialism until the country becomes fully communist.