Apologies to you, Crocodile. You see, farming is something I know more about that just about anything else. And so when you said what you said about farming vs prehistoric practices, it immediately put my mind to all the herbicides, pesticides, insecticides, fungicides, and fertilizers and other things that are used, and run off, and form persistent ecosystem contaminants, or do other things like eutrophication, that I said you don't have any credibility. The general population knows very little about what goes on in agriculture, and feed lots, and abattoirs, and things like deforestation used for short term farming. But now I read that you specifically point out about chemicals, and so I know, yes you do know something about it. The scope and scale of modern practices is orders of magnitude beyond prehistoric ecosystem impact.
It definitely is. Also, there are numerous other nasty ways that some of the major ecosystems are being adversely affected, something that was unimaginable before. Btw, I have an impression that those genetically modified goodies is just another attempt to escape the nasty chemicals used in production of the so-called "natural and organic foods", aren't they?
Ostensibly. In reality, look into what Monsanto is doing with gm seeds with respect to monopolization of AG. Farmers are unable to keep seed over winter, but must buy new seed for new crop season. They are using the licensing gimmick that software companies are using. The gm seeds are patented, and can only be purchased with licensing type agreement. And so MON comes out with another new improved gm seed type just in time to avoid patent expiry, and everyone has to buy. The gm thing is more about commercialization/monopolization than anything else.
Russian Lessons | Russian Tests and Quizzes | Russian Vocabulary |